Page 346 - alligood 8th edition_Neat

CHAPTER 17 Sister Callista Roy 327

Book Chapters Roy, C. (1989). The Roy adaptation model. In J. P. Riehl
Barone, S. H., & Roy, C. (1996). The Roy adaptation (Ed.), Conceptual models for nursing practice (3rd ed.,
model in research: Rehabilitation nursing. In P. H. pp. 105–114). Norwalk, (CT): Appleton & Lange.
Walker & B. Neuman (Eds.), Blueprint for use of nurs- Roy, C. (1991). Altered cognition: An information processing
ing models: Education, research, practice, and admin- approach. In P. H. Mitchell, L. C. Hodges, M. Muwaswes,
istration (pp. 64–87). New York: National League for & C. A. Walleck (Eds.), AANN’s neuroscience nursing:
Nursing. Phenomenon and practice: Human responses to neurologi-
Morgillo-Freeman, S. & Roy, C. (2005). Cognitive behavior cal health problems (pp. 185–211). Norwalk, (CT):
therapy and the Roy Adaptation Model: A discussion of Appleton & Lange.
theoretical integration. In S. M. Freeman & A. Freeman Roy, C. (1991). Structure of knowledge: Paradigm, model,
(Eds.), Cognitive behavior therapy in nursing practice and research specifications for differentiated practice.
(pp. 3–27). New York: Springer. In I. E. Goertzen (Ed.), Differentiating nursing practice:
Roy, C. (1974). The Roy adaptation model. In J. P. Riehl Into the twenty-first century (pp. 31–39). Kansas City,
& C. Roy (Eds.), Conceptual models for nursing prac- (MO): American Academy of Nursing.
tice (pp. 135–144). New York: Appleton-Century- Roy, C. (1992). Vigor, variables, and vision: Commentary
Crofts. of Florence Nightingale. In F. Nightingale (Ed.), Notes
Roy, C. (1980). The Roy adaptation model. In J. P. Riehl & on nursing: What it is, and what it is not (Commemora-
C. Roy (Eds.), Conceptual models for nursing practice tive edition, pp. 63–71). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
(2nd ed., pp. 179–188). New York: Appleton-Century- Roy, C. (2000). Alteration in cognitive processing.
Crofts. In C. Stewart-Amidei, J. Kunkel, & K. Bronstein (Eds.),
Roy, C. (1981). A systems model of nursing care and its AANN’s neuroscience nursing: Human responses to
effect on the quality of human life. In G. E. Lasker neurologic dysfunction (2nd ed., pp. 275–323).
(Ed.), Applied systems and cybernetics. Vol. 4. Systems Philadelphia: Saunders.
research in health care, biocybernetics, and ecology Roy, C. (2000). NANDA and the nurse theorists: The truth
(pp. 1705–1714). New York: Pergamon. of nursing theory. In North American Nursing Diagnosis
Roy, C. (1983). A conceptual framework for clinical specialist Association, Classification of nursing diagnoses (pp. 59–57).
practice. In A. B. Hamrick & J. Spross (Eds.), The clinical St. Louis: Mosby.
nurse specialist in theory and practice (pp. 3–20). New York: Roy, C. (2001). Alterations in cognitive processing.
Grune & Stratton. In C. Stewart-Amidei & J. A. Kunkel (Eds.), AANN’s
Roy, C. (1983). Roy adaptation model. In I. Clements & neuroscience nursing: Human responses to neurologic
F. Roberts (Eds.), Family health: A theoretical approach dysfunction (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
to family health(pp. 255–278). New York: Wiley. Roy, C. (2007). The Roy Adaptation Model: Historical and phil-
Roy, C. (1983). Theory development in nursing: A pro- osophical foundations. In Maria Elisa Moreno et al. (Eds.),
posal for direction. In N. Chaska (Ed.), The nursing Application del model adaptacion en el ciclo vital humano
profession: A time to speak (pp. 453–467). New York: (2nd ed.). Chia, Columbia: Universidad de La Sabana.
McGraw-Hill. Roy, C., & Anway, J. (1989). Roy’s adaptation model: Theories
Roy, C. (1983). The expectant family: Analysis and application and hypotheses for nursing administration. In B. Henry,
of the Roy adaptation model, and the family in primary M. DiVincenti, C. Arndt, & A. Marriner Tomey (Eds.),
care—Analysis and application of the Roy adaptation Dimensions of nursing administration: ‘Theory, research,
model. In I. W. Clements & F. B. Roberts (Eds.), Family education, and practice (pp. 75–88). Boston: Blackwell
health: A theoretical approach to nursing care (pp. 298–303). Scientific.
New York: Wiley. Roy, C., & Corliss, C. P. (1993). The Roy adaptation model.
Roy, C. (1987). Roy’s adaptation model. In R. R. Parse Theoretical update and knowledge for practice. In M. E.
(Ed.), Nursing science: Major paradigms, theories, and Parker (Ed.), Patterns of nursing theories in practice
critiques (pp. 35–45). Philadelphia: Saunders. (pp. 215–229). New York: National League for Nursing.
Roy, C. (1987). The influence of nursing models on clini- Roy, C., & McLeod, D. (1981). Theory of the person as an
cal decision making II. In K. J. Hannah, M. Reimer, adaptive system. In C. Roy & S. L. Roberts (Eds.),
W. C. Mills, & S. Letourneau (Eds.), Clinical judgment Theory construction in nursing: An adaptation model
and decision making. The future of nursing diagnosis (pp. 49–69). Englewood Cliffs, (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
(pp. 42–47). New York: Wiley. Roy, C., & Zhan, L. (2001). The Roy adaptation model:
Roy, C. (1988). Sister Callista Roy. In T. M. Schorr & A basis for developing knowledge for practice with the
A. Zimmerman (Eds.), Making choices: Taking chances elderly. In M. Parker, (Ed.), Nursing theories and nurs-
(pp. 291–298). St. Louis: Mosby. ing practice (pp. 315–342). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.