Page 343 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 343

324    UNIT III  Nursing Conceptual Models

           De Chardin, P. T. (1966). Man’s place in nature. New York:   Hill, B. J., & Roberts, C. S. (1981). Formal theory construc-
             Harper & Row.                                 tion: An example of the process. In C. Roy & S. L. Roberts
           De Chardin, P. T. (1969). Human energy. New York:   (Eds.), Theory construction in nursing: An adaptation
             Harper & Row.                                 model. Englewood Cliffs, (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
           DeSanto-Madeya, S. (2009). Adaptation to spinal cord in-  Illich, I. (1974). Medical nemesis. Lancet, 1, 918–921.
             jury for families post-injury. Nursing Science Quarterly,   Illich, I. (1976). Limits to medicine: Medical nemesis, the
             22, 57–66.                                    expropriation of health. London: Boyars.
           Dickoff, J., James, P., & Wiedenbach, E. (1968a). Theory in   Jirovec, M. M., Jenkins, J., Isenberg, M., & Baiardi, J. (1999).
             a practice discipline. I. Practice oriented discipline.   Urine control theory derived from Roy’s conceptual
             Nursing Research, 17, 415–435.                framework. Nursing Science Quarterly, 12, 251–255.
           Dickoff, J., James, P., & Wiedenbach, E. (1968b). Theory in   Kan, E. Z. (2009). Perceptions of recovery, physical health,
             a practice discipline. II. Practice oriented research.   personal meaning, role function, and social support
             Nursing Research, 17, 545–554.                after first-time coronary artery bypass surgery. Dimen-
           DiMattio, M. J., & Tulman, L. (2003). A longitudinal study   sions of Critical Care Nursing, 28, 189–195.
             of functional status and correlates following coronary   Keen, M., Breckenridge, D., Frauman, A. C, Hartigan,
             artery bypass graft surgery in women. Nursing Research,   M. F., Smith, L., & Butera, E. (1998). Nursing assess-
             52, 98–107.                                   ment and intervention for adult hemodialysis patients:
           Dixon, E. L. (1999). Community health nursing practice   Application of Roy’s adaptation model. American
             and the Roy adaptation model. Public Health Nursing,   Nephrology Nurses’ Association Journal, 25, 311–319.
             16, 290–300.                                Lankester, K., & Sheldon, L. M. (1999). Health visiting
           Dobratz, M. C. (2003). Putting the pieces together: Teaching   with Roy’s model: A case study. Journal of Child Health
             undergraduate research from a theoretical perspective.   Care, 3, 28–34.
             Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41, 383–392.   Levesque, L., Ricard, N., Ducharme, F., Duquette, A., &
           Dobratz, M. C. (2011). Toward development of a middle-  Bonin, J. P. (1998). Empirical verification of a theoreti-
             range theory of psychological adaptation in death and   cal model derived from the Roy adaptation model:
             dying. Nursing Science Quarterly, 24(4), 370–376.  Findings from five studies. Nursing Science Quarterly,
           Ducharme, E., Ricard, N., Duquette, A., Levesque, L., &   11(1), 31–39.
             Lachance, L. (1998). Empirical testing of a longitudinal   Limandri, B. J. (1986). Research and practice with abused
             model derived from the Roy adaptation model. Nursing   women—Use of the Roy adaptation model as an
             Science Quarterly, 11, 149–159.               explanatory framework. Advances in Nursing Science, 8,
           Dunn, K. S. (2004). Toward a middle-range theory of   52–61.
             adaptation to chronic pain. Nursing Science Quarterly,   Malinski, V. M. (2000). Commentary. Nursing Science
             77, 78–84.                                    Quarterly, 13(1), 16–17.
           Farkas, L. (1981). Adaptation problems with nursing home   Mastal, M. F., & Hammond, H. (1980). Analysis and expan-
             application for elderly persons: An application of the   sion of the Roy adaptation model: A contribution to
             Roy adaptation nursing model. Journal of Advanced   holistic nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 2, 71–81.
             Nursing, 6, 363–368.                        Mastal, M. F., Hammond, H., & Roberts, M. P. (1982).
           Fawcett, J. (2002). The nurse theorists: 21st-century updates—  Theory into hospital practice: A pilot implementation.
             Callista Roy. Nursing Science Quarterly, 15, 308–310.  Journal of Nursing Administration, 12, 9–15.
           Fawcett, J. (2005). Roy’s adaptation model. In J. Fawcett   McDonald, F. J., & Harms, M. (1966). Theoretical model for
             (Ed.), Analysis and evaluation of contemporary nursing   an experimental curriculum. Nursing Outlook, 14, 48–51.
             knowledge: Nursing models and theories (2nd ed.)   Meleis, A. I. (1985). Theoretical nursing development and
             (pp. 364–437). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.     progress. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
           Frame, K., Kelly, L., & Bayley, E. (2003). Increasing percep-  Meleis, A. I. (2007). Theoretical nursing development and
             tions of self-worth in preadolescents diagnosed with   progress(4th ed.) Philadelphia: Lippincott.
             ADHD. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35, 225–229.  Modrcin-McCarthy, M. A., McCue, S., & Walker, J. (1997).
           Frederickson, K. (2000). Nursing knowledge development   Preterm infants and STRESS: A tool for the neonatal
             through research: Using the Roy adaptation model.   nurse. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 10, 62–71.
             Nursing Science Quarterly, 13, 12–16.       Modrcin-Talbott, M. A., Harrison, L. L., Groer, M. W., &
           Galligan, A. C. (1979). Addressing small children. Using   Younger, M. S. (2003). The biobehavioral effects of gen-
             Roy’s concept of adaptation to care for young children.   tle human touch on preterm infants. Nursing Science
             American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 4, 24–28.  Quarterly, 16, 60–67.
   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348