Page 647 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 647

628    UNIT V  Middle Range Nursing Theories

           unequivocally human, rather than psychological, so-  A feature of Barker’s nursing practice has been his
           cial,  or  physical  (Barker,  2002b).  The  Tidal  Model   exploration of the possibilities of genuine collabora-
           “emphasizes  the  central  importance  of  developing    tive relationships with users of mental health services.
           understanding of the person’s needs through collab-  In  the  1980s,  he  developed  the  concept  of  “caring
           orative working, developing a therapeutic relationship   with”  people,  learning  that  the  professional-person
           through  discrete  methods  of  active  empowerment,   relationship could be more “mutual” than the original
           establishing  nursing  as  an  educative  element  at  the   nurse-patient relationship defined by Peplau (1969).
           heart of interdisciplinary intervention” (Barker, 2000e,   Barker  further  developed  this  concept  during  the
           p. 4) and seeks to resolve problems and promote men-  1990s in a working relationship with Dr. Irene White-
           tal  health  through  narrative  approaches  (Stevenson,   hill  and  others  who  used  mental  health  services
           Barker, & Fletcher, 2002).                    (Barker  &  Whitehill,  1997).  This  led  to  the  “need
             The Tidal Model is a philosophical approach to   for nursing” and “empowerment” studies as well as a
           recovery of mental health. It is not a model of care   commitment to publish the stories of people’s experi-
           or  treatment  of  mental  illness,  although  people    ence of madness, and their voyage of recovery, com-
           described as mentally ill do need and receive care.   plete  with  personal  and  spiritual  meanings  (Barker,
           The Tidal Model represents a worldview, helping the   Campbell  and  Davidson,  1999;  Barker,  Jackson,  &
           nurse begin to understand what mental health might   Stevenson, 1999a; Barker & Buchanan-Barker, 2004b).
           mean for the person in care, and how that person   Barker  enlisted  the  support  of  Dr.  Whitehill  and
           might  be  helped  to  begin  the  complex  voyage  of    other “user/consumer consultants,” to evaluate “user
           recovery. Therefore, the Tidal Model is not prescrip-  friendly”  qualities  of  the  original  processes  of  the
           tive. Rather, a set of principles, the Ten Tidal Com-  Tidal  Model.  This  involvement  of  “user/consumer
           mitments,  serve  as  a  metaphorical  compass  for    consultants” is seen in several ongoing projects and
           the practitioner (Buchanan-Barker & Barker, 2005,   represents a distinctive feature of continued develop-
           2008). They guide the nurse in developing responses   ment of the Tidal Model.
           to  meet  the  individual  and  contextual  needs  of    Barker’s long-standing appreciation of Eastern phi-
           the person who has become the patient. The experi-  losophies  pervades  his  work.  The  work  of  Shoma
           ence  of  mental  distress  is  invariably  described  in   Morita is a specific example of how the philosophical
           metaphorical  terms.  The  Tidal  Model  employs  the   assumptions  of  Zen  Buddhism  were  integrated  with
           universal and culturally significant metaphors asso-  psychotherapy  (Morita,  Kondo,  Levine,  &  Morita,
           ciated with the power of water and the sea, to repre-  1998). Morita’s dictum—”Do what needs to be done”—
           sent the known aspects of human distress. Water is   resonates  in  many  of  the  practical  activities  of  the
           “the core metaphor for both the lived experience of   Tidal  Model.  In  contrast  to  the  zealous  “problem-
           the person . . . and the care system that attempts to   solving” attitude embraced by much of Western psy-
           mold  itself  around  a  person’s  need  for  nursing”   chiatry  and  psychology,  Morita  believed  that  it  was
           (Barker, 2000e, p. 10).                       futile  to  try  to  “change”  oneself  or  one’s  “problems,”
             Barker  describes  an  “early  interest  in  the  human   which come and go like the weather. Instead, the focus
           content  of  mental  distress . . . and  an  interest  in  the    should be on answering the questions:
           human  (phenomenological)  experience  of  distress,”   •  What is my purpose in living?
           which  is  viewed  in  contexts  and  wholes  rather  than   •  What needs to be done now?
           isolated parts (Barker, 1999b, p. 13). The “whole” nature   People have the capacity to live and grow through
           of being human is “re-presented on physical, emotional,   distress, by doing what needs to be done. For people
           intellectual, social and spiritual planes” (Barker, 2002b,    who are in acute distress, especially when they are at
           p.  233).  This  phenomenological  interest  pervades  the   risk  to  self  or  others,  it  is  vital  that  nurses  relate
           Tidal Model with an emphasis on the lived experience   directly  to  the  person’s  ongoing  experience.  Origi-
           of persons, their stories (replete with metaphors), and   nally  Barker  called  this  process  engagement,  but  he
           narrative interventions. Nurses carefully and sensitively   has since redefined the specific interpersonal process
           meet  and  interact  with  people  in  a  “sacred  space”   as bridging, a supportive human process necessary to
           (Barker, 2003a, p. 613).                      reach out to people in distress. This emphasizes the
   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652