Page 648 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 648

CHAPTER 32  Phil Barker  629

           need to build, creatively, a means of reaching the per-  living,  merely  pragmatic  strategies  for  living  with
           son;  crossing  in  the  process,  the  murky  waters  of   such problems. The influence of Denny Webster and
           mental distress (Barker & Buchanan-Barker, 2004b).  her colleagues in Denver in the early 1990s, introduc-
             The Tidal Model may be viewed through the lens of   ing  de  Shazer’s  ideas  into  nursing  practice,  signifi-
           social constructivism, recognizing that there are mul-  cantly  shaped  the  development  of  the  Tidal  Model
           tiple  ways  of  understanding  the  world.  Meaning   (Webster,  Vaughn,  &  Martinez,  1994).The  Tidal
           emerges  through  the  complex  webs  of  interaction,    Model  draws  its  core  philosophical  metaphor  from
           relationships,  and  social  processes.  Knowledge  does   chaos  theory,  where  the  unpredictable  yet  bounded
           not exist independently of the knower, and all knowl-  nature  of  human  behavior  and  experience  can  be
           edge is situated (Stevenson, 1996). Change is the only   compared  to  the  flow  and  power  of  water  (Barker,
           constant, as meaning and social realities are constantly   2000b, p. 54). In constant flux, the tides ebb and flow;
           renegotiated  or  constructed  through  language  and    they  exhibit  nonrepeating  patterns  yet  stay  within
           interaction.  Barker  believes  “all  I  am  is  story;  all  I    bounded parameters (Vicenzi, 1994). Barker (2000b)
           can ever be is story.” As people try to explain to others   acknowledges the “complexity [of] both the internal
           “who”  they  are,  they  tell  stories  about  themselves    universe of human experience and the external uni-
           and their world of experience, revising, editing, and   verse, which is, paradoxically, within and beyond the
           rewriting these stories through dialogue. Barker first   individual, at one and the same time” (p. 52). Within
           discussed this idea with his mentor, Hilda (Hildegard)   this  complex,  nonlinear  perspective,  small  changes
           Peplau in 1994, who agreed that “people make them-  create later unpredictable changes; a hopeful message
           selves  up  as  they  talk”  (Barker,  2003a;  Barker  &   that  directs  nurses  and  persons  to  identify  small
           Buchanan-Barker, 2007b).                      changes  and  variations.  Chaos  theory  suggests  that
             Barker credits many thinkers with influencing his   there  are  limits  to  what  we  can  know,  and  Barker
           work,  beginning  with  Annie  Altschul  and  Thomas   invites nurses to cease the search for certainty, em-
           Szasz. His view of mental health problems as problems   bracing instead the reality of uncertainty. Know that
           of living popularized by Szasz (1961, 2000) and later   “change is constant,” one of the Ten Tidal Commit-
           Podvoll (1990) is a perspective he prefers to diagnos-  ments,  identifies  and  celebrates  change  in  people,
           tic labeling and the biomedical construction of people   circumstances,  relationships,  and  organizations
           and  illness  (Barker,  2001c,  p.  215).  He  agrees  with   (Barker,  2003b;  Buchanan-Barker  &  Barker,  2008).
           Szasz  that  it  is  futile  to  try  to  “solve  problems  in    This perspective also presents challenges in trying to
           living.”  Life  is  not  a  problem  to  be  solved.  Life  is   understand  people,  relationships,  and  situations.  It
           something to be lived, as intelligently, as competently,   directs inquiry in qualitative, nonlinear ways, such as
           as well as we can, day in and day out (Miller, 1983,   action  research,  grounded  theory,  phenomenology,
           p. 290). The challenge for nursing is to help persons   and critical theory (Barker, 1999a).
           live “intelligently” and “competently.”         Annie Altschul, the Grande Dame of British psychi-
             Travelbee’s (1969) concept of the Therapeutic Use   atric nursing (Barker, 2003a, p. 12), along with Hilda
           of Self flows through the Tidal Model and provides an   (Hildegard)  Peplau,  was  one  of  Barker’s  mentors.
           anchor for the “proper focus of nursing.” The follow-  Altschul’s influence, especially her early appreciation of
           ing three main theoretical frameworks underpin the   system theory, is evident in the Tidal Model, as is her
           Tidal Model:                                  interest in understanding rather than explaining mental
            1.  Peplau’s (1952; 1969) Interpersonal Relations Theory  distress and her belief that people need more straight-
             2.  Theory of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing   forward help than many psychiatric theories suggest.
             derived from the Need for Nursing studies     Barker  credits  Peplau,  the  mother  of  psychiatric
             3.  Empowerment within interpersonal relationships  nursing, with his becoming “an advocate for nursing
             The pragmatic emphasis on strength-based, solu-  as  a  therapeutic  activity  in  its  own  right”  (Barker,
           tion-focused approaches acknowledges the important   2000a, p. 617). Peplau introduced her interpersonal
           influence of Steve de Shazer’s solution-focused ther-  paradigm for the study and practice of nursing in the
           apy, although, as noted above, Barker does not believe   early  1950s  and  defined  nursing  as  “a  significant,
           that  there  can  be  any  “solutions”  for  problems  in    therapeutic,  interpersonal  process”  (Peplau,  1952,
   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653