Page 124 - MS Year in Review 2020
P. 124

THE CULTURAL PROBLEM AT IBM


           Give the above discussion, we can now explain the cause of the cultural problem at
           IBM. Specifically, the cultural problem was that IBM’s core values did not include

           the last two dimensions of culture cited above, but especially commitment to
           change. IBM did have strong “company process orientation,” but it was not an
           explicit part of their stated culture.


           Resistance to Change


           What happened? The actual problem was that IBM saw itself as a “Big Iron”
           company—specifically, a main-frame company. IBM, it will be recalled, set up a

           separate division in Boca Raton to create its famous “PC” to compete with Apple, et.
           al. and it was successful! I recall an issue of Business Week that where the cover
           said: “… and the Winner is…IBM! Unfortunately, the mainframe folks at IBM would

           not accept the success of the PC because it competed with their cash cow-- the
           mainframe! They told customers “you don’t need these ‘PC’s; you can do everything

           you want with a mainframe and dumb terminals”! and for a while this sales
           message worked—until it didn’t! When it stopped working and mainframe sales
           began to decline, there were serious consequences.


           The Consequences of the Cultural Omission at IBM


           When I visited IBM, we discussed their “no layoff practice.” One visitor erroneously
           referred to it as a “no layoff policy.” He was corrected. It was a practice not

           a policy! In effect, IBM reserved the right to do a layoff if and when it was
           deemed necessary. And ultimately, because of the lack of willingness to change

           when micro computing was developed, IBM had their first ever layoff, and went
           from 425,00 people to 165,000 people, while allowing Microsoft, Intel, and Apple
           among other to become giants! All due to as subtle flaw in their culture, a flaw of

           omission not commission!


           What was required was a culture that was committed to change and innovation—
           not to resistance to change and to the suppression of innovation.




                                                            123
                                       © Management Systems Consulting Corporation, 2020.  All rights reserved
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129