Page 8 - Lamplight Magazine (1)
P. 8

I
                                                                                  O n  the p olitic al signifi canc e and p o w er of  T he End
                                                                           of Ed d y,  I don’t think  I  c ould add t o wha t has  been said
                                                                           in the tw o year s sinc e its English  tr ansla tion. Ye t it is
                                                                           curious t o  me  tha t wha t is a t best  an aver ag ely wr itt en
                                                                           book has dr a wn almost no criticism.
                                                                                     I n the  fir st  p ar agr ap h Édouard Louis issues
                                                                           himself a lit er ary manda t e:  ‘sufferin g is a ll-c onsuming : it
                                                                           someho w ge t s rid  of any t hing   tha t doesn’t fit  in to it s
         THE END                                                           s y s tem.’  Is  it an imp ossible task ? From  Ed dy  alone, it’s
                                                                           unclear. To crea t e his  Lit er a ture of Violenc e, Louis
         OF EDDY:                                                          disp enses with eleganc e, me tap hor and almost every -
                                                                           thing else. He has  a horror of every thing tha t
                                                                           c omp lica t es  or c louds  the even ts of his  book. H is
                                                                           writing is sp ecific, blun t, simp le. Violenc e  in our w orld,
                                                                           esp ecially  homop hobic violenc e,  is no t c omp le x or
                                                                           sub tle. It’s the blun t  st one  of the stup id and evil. A nd
                                                                           so Louis disp enses with c omp le xity  and sub tle ty. He
                                                                           rejects  the imagined w orlds and  char act er s of fi ction.
                                                                           He writ es aut obio gr ap hically, no t alleg orically : he say s
                                                                           writing fic tion w ould  make him ashamed. To say  it w as
                                                                           ‘ nec essary ’  t o writ e this w ay t o  e xpress these horrific
                                                                           even ts w ould belittle Louis.  It is  clear t o anyone tha t
                                                                           the  book  migh t  have  been wr itt en a hundred o ther
                                                                           w ay s. B ut no, he c hose this mode bec ause any o ther
                                                                           w ould  have felt  insinc ere, c o w ardly and  lacked the
                                                                           revolutionary feeling he desired.
                                                                                     S o  suffering  is the sinkhole  a t the c en tre  of  this
                                                                           novel, sucking  every thing do wn in t o  oblivion tha t isn’t
                                                                           itself. Ye t  there are  momen ts when some thing escap es.
                                                                           A  line desc ribing the c ardboard  he a ttached t o his bike
                                                                           t o  imita t e the sound of a mo t orcycle: a little scr ap  of
                                                                           childhood p leasure. B ut wha t he has already said is:
                                                                           ‘From my child hood  I  ha ve no ha ppy m emories .’  T hen,
                                                                           again, a t the end of the third chap t er, a  hurried c ollag e
                                                                           of Louis ’s  a ffection for Hallenc ourt:  ‘ t he pea ce ful
                                     THE ‘LITERATURE                       silence of  t he sma ll s tre e ts ,  th e old lad y  wh o ga ve us
                                                                           s w e e t s’,  e t c . I n the end violenc e w on’t c onsume
                                     OF VIOLENCE’                          everything. T he st eady voic e with its measured f ury
                                     AND IT S POLITIC S                    gives w ay, evap or a t es  momen tarily. T his  adds, r a ther

                                                                           than de tr acts, as perhap s Louis feared. Hallenc ourt –
                                     By Jack Meadows
                                                                           un til no w a  blac k cr a t er of misery and violenc e  –
                                                                           re turns  t o itself, and w e find it t o  be  c omp osed of
                                                                           ‘apple  t re es ’,  ‘wa rm m il k fresh from  the fa rm’  and an
                                                                           ‘explosion of au tum nal colour s ’ . T ha t  a  p lac e migh t be
                                                                           bo th this  calm, indifferen t chamber of beauty, and the
                                                                           host of a violenc e which  floods it, is a more  horrify ing
                                                                           re flection I think .


                                                              07
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13