Page 9 - Lamplight Magazine (1)
P. 9

If you’re g oing t o  emp loy a sty le p o w erful bec ause of its   abuse; the st eady evolution in humilia tion and violenc e;
         sp areness you must  resp ec t its limita tions.  O ne in  this   finally, the masochistic disapp oin tmen t of  its
         instanc e is tha t  the lyrical and the p oe tic  oft en  have no   disap p ear anc e. O therwise, structure and narr a tive  are
         p lac e. Tr ansitions t o the ly rical me tap hor ( ‘ t he s mell of my   destroyed so tha t the violen t ep isodes can ambush us.
         fa th er’s g roan hung  in  th e air of  th e bed room’ ; ‘sound of a   T here’s no w ay of an ticip a ting  their oc currenc e or  na ture.
         hea rtbeat ,  t hen a  ha mm er;  t he  t w o  to ge t her c ombine in a n   It’s disorien ta ting and brutal. I nside the chap t er s, the prose
         in fernal  s ymphony ’ )  have  no  meaning in this w orld whic h   is no more  obedien t. It regularly w ander s off  from its line
         o therwise Louis w an ts us t o ac c ep t as a str aigh tforw ard   of though t on  a loosely  rela t ed tang en t. We migh t  g e t the
         rep ort of  the truth. He  e xp lains p eop le t o us sociolo gically   fir st sen t enc e or tw o of  a st ory  Eddy ’s  mo ther used  t o t ell
         and describes inciden ts p lainly. T he scien tific is mean t t o   him, be fore being  divert ed for  tw o p ag es  t o w ard the na ture
         c onvinc e us of his  objec tivity ; the  p lainness is mean t t o give   of his mo ther’s languag e,  finally  re turning  t o finish the
         the  even ts believability. B o th are t ools  there fore for crea ting   st ory. T he imp ression  is of being  t old a st ory by  a f riend:
         a sense of ‘objective truth’. Ye t  c onsider this p assag e:        in tima t e and  c onver sa tional. Ye t it  is also chao tic, it is no t
                  ‘By say ing it  t hey inscribed  it  on me permanen t ly like   clear tha t the st ory t eller is a p articularly  good  one; he  is
         stigm at a,   th ose m arks  t ha t   t he G re eks  w ould  c a rve  wit h a   naïve, t elling p ain ful st ories  for the fir st time, having t o
         red-ho t iron or a knife in to  the bodies of de vian t   justify everything  along the w ay, e xp laining  it t o himself
         individua ls…I m possible  to rid my self of  t his.’     and rep ea t edly g oing back t o fill in gap s. It’s  no t tha t the
                   I n the w orld of  Edd y  languag e  canno t p re t end t o this   de tails of these discur sions are  un w elc ome or unnec essary,
         p ermanen t  kind of po w er. T hings  are w ha t  they are. A  g ob of   as if  they w ere someho w ‘distr ac ting  from the real  thing’. It
         sp it is  no t, for  instanc e, a w e t yello w c annonball, but  ju st a   is tha t  the order and manner of  their deliver y has  no t  been
         gob of spit , and  is  only analo gic al  if it is like the (lit er ally   c onsidered. Perhap s the in t en tion w as t o  crea t e the chao tic,
         iden tical) mucus of an old p er son’s  throa t. T he g ob  d rips   meandering voic e  of  a bad and c hildish  st ory t eller  t o re flect
         do wn the c heek,  it  does no t  rus h  o r  hurtle ; it is no t   the  difficulty of  rec onstruc ting these  memories. A ny w ay, the
         an throp omorp hised as an imagina tive display. Louis has   oc c asional p ayoff is tha t the voic e can re turn f rom these
         w onderful restr ain t. No thing  is ly ricised, no thing is   tang en ts and deliver a sudden,  disturbing  sen t enc e which
         beautified, hardly  any thing is  alleg or ised in  case it loses its   gr a t es against the in timac y ac cumula t ed  by  the voic e along
         hard po w er. T he  p erf ume of roman tic ism is no t allo w ed t o   the w ay:  ‘He ju st  fell  in to  the  toile t. ’   He being a miscarried
         se ttle for a momen t. It is very  much  like  a f riend describing   child.
         some thing  a wful which hap p ened t o him, and no t a t  all like a          It is in t eresting t o no t e  tha t John B urnside,  on the back
         novel. T he e xp lana tions offered are some times  banal  t o the   of the book , thinks  it  is ‘care fully cr a ft ed’. T he book is
         p oin t of t ear s ( ‘w e are a lway s pl ay ing  rol es  an d  t here is a   clearly a revolt  agains t  cr a ft and c onstruction. T his is why
         cert ain  tru t h  to m asks ’ )  and some times insigh tful  ( ‘a desperate,   w e g e t  asides  like:  ‘ (I d id n’t  sa y it exa ct ly like  t hat , but some
         con tinu al,  const a n tl y renew ed  e ffort   to pl ace som e pe ople on  a    da y s …I’m  too  w orn  out  to  t ry  to re con st ru ct   t he l ang uage  t hat
         level belo w you,  n o t  to be on  t he lo w es t run g of  t he social   I spoke back  t hen )’ . A bit  of dec onstr uction; a sp lodg e  of
         la dd er’ ).  B ut the p oin t  is they do no t  emp loy languag e for   an ti-lit er a ture. Louis ’s  p o w er is  in his a tt en tive  rec rea tion
         much more than it is used in everyday life. T hus momen ts like   of the brutal languag e whic h c omposed his youth.  It’s a
         the  one  above jar. T he  p ermanen t stigma ta is p recisely the   str ang e, self-de fea ting move  t o then deny his book  this
         kind of hyp e rbole  Ed dy  rejects. It  is art’s thea tric alisa tion of   p o w er. At o ther times, the asides are t ouching and  disp lay
         the  tr uth. B ut  Eddy ’s  whole e ffort is t o sho w tha t languag e is   his vulner ability :  ‘ a nd no w I ’m  cry ing  as I  write  t hese l ines ’.
         a t emp or ary  social c onstruc t w aiting t o be t orn do wn.          A ng er has focused and limit ed  this w or k. T here can be
                   Structur ally, there’s no thing t o see here. T he book is   no ca thar sis,  rec oncilia tion, beauty, p leasure – all  these
         sp lit in t o tw o p arts, and then  in t o chap t er s which are   things  are sw allo w ed up in the Lit er a ture of Violenc e.
         non-chronolo gical  and arr ang ed mostly a t  r andom. T here is a   D e fender s will say this is his  ac hievemen t; tha t  this is the
         vague sense  tha t  time has p assed as w e g e t  t o w ards the la t er   ‘realistic ’   p ortr ay al of violen t e xp erienc e. Ye t is it true  tha t
         chap t er s. B ut this is  frequen tly be tr ayed by leaps back  in t o   in life  these things are denied t o us? D oes violenc e
         the  p ast. T he only true  str uctur al t ool is  a narr a tive loop    c olonise every thing? It  doesn’t ma tt er. T he question  the
         which leads  bac k rep ea t edly  t o the c orri dor where Eddy  is   reader must  answ er  is  should  it do  so within  lit er a ture.
         bullied by tw o o ther boy s. T hrough this  rec urrenc e w e
         rec eive  an  i ncreasing sense  of horror: the  reliable, e xp ec t ed

                                                              08
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14