Page 24 - FMT_02_Feb 2020_CS6.indd

Ingredients

The test has been performed on
both days at the same time in the
morning. Afterwards a questionnaire
was completed according to the
following three criteria: satiety
before and after the shake, well-
being before and after the shake and
the mouthfeel of the shake during
and after consumption. The results
are shown in the following fi gures.

CONCLUSION
The results in figure 1 show that

there is a saturation effect with both
shakes. After the consumption, the
number of participants who started
the trials hungry decreased with
both shakes. This reduction was
higher after the shake with fi bers.
There where also more participants
Figure 4 shows the mouthfeel of the shakes while drinking. Multiple answers were possible. 20

participants said that the shakes were creamy. 16 participants perceived the shake with fibers highly sated after the shake with
as pleasant and 10 as unpleasant; they mentioned that the shake was too thick. None of the fibers. This indicates that indeed

participants had an unpleasant mouthfeel while consuming the shake without fibers - 24 perceived both shakes have a saturation effect

this shake as pleasant.
but this effect occurs stronger after

fiber enriched protein shake with a group were served a fi ber rich the consumption of the shake with

standard one. version of the same protein shake fibers. Another argument for this
enriched with SANACEL® add 045. presumption is the result shown

For the test 32 people had to drink a The test has been performed as a in figure 2. 26% of the participants
protein shake two days in a row. On blind test, the test persons didn’t stayed sated more than 3 hours
day one the shake did not contain know on which day they received after the shake with fi bers, for

fibers. On the second day the test the shake with or without fi bers. the shake without fibers it where

only 14%. The results from fi gure 3
show that a few participants had
Figure 5 shows the mouthfeel of the shakes after consumption. Multiple answers where possible. After
the consumption of the shake with fibers 12 participants had a coated/ furred tongue, 4 a dry and 16 gastro-intestinal problems after the

a typical/normal mouthfeel. After the consumption of the shake without fibers 6 had a coated/furred consumption of the shake with and

tongue, 2 a dry and 20 a typical/normal mouthfeel.
without fibers. This indicates that

the two shakes are similar tolerated
mouthfeel a er consump on in the gastrointestinal tract. On the
basis that 75% of the participants
25
never drink protein shakes and
the problems only occurred for
20 people of this group, it seems that
number of consent 15 with fibres unusual high protein content of the
these problems are a result of the
shakes. However, this is not a proven
presumption.
10
5 without fibres The results of the questions
regarding the mouthfeel show, that
0 both shakes have a nice creamy
coated/furred dry typical/normal texture. In general, the shake

tongue with fibers was perceived more
percep on unpleasant than the shake without
fibers. The main reason is the too

Food Marketing & Technology 24 February 2020