Page 130 - Looking_after_school
P. 130

Looking after school: a critical analysis of personalisation in education

                we find indeed worthwhile to defend, but which is made impossible by
                both the normalising educational institution (of the modern era) and
                by the personalising learning environment. This scholastic approach of
                newcomers is not only overshadowed by external, economic, or socio-
                logical approaches; these external approaches also rob the school of
                its powers to change society and open up the future.

                Keeping children out of factories


                We are well aware that the school can disappear, just as democracy can
                disappear. A society may no longer chose scholastic forms of learning
                in light of freedom, equality, and formation. We can imagine a society
                that chooses resolutely for extreme forms of personalisation, that de-
                schools the school from within. At the same time, we are also aware
                that a society which does make choices for the school is confronted
                with a major challenge; after all, the school will always need to be
                reinvented. The 19th century school is certainly not the model for the
                school of the future. The 19th century school, itself, was modelled as
                an industrial factory. Similarly, we should perhaps be careful to use
                the contemporary FabLabs and other open platforms which want to
                exploit creativity as models for the school of the future. Those labs
                and platforms of the creative economy may very well be inclusive and
                open, as they are immediately in service of the development of talent,
                production, and innovation; yet these creative workspaces are also
                factories. The school as a FabLab is a place where the youth discovers
                and develops their talents whilst fabricating and innovating. This is
                hardly about pedagogical freedom, equality, and formation, just as
                                                   9
                little as it is about study and practice.   It seems important to us to
                keep children out of the factories, at least for a while yet. So, a differ-
                ent, more pedagogical imagination is needed when we talk about the
                school of the future.
                The foregoing is often misread as a plea to keep everything that has to
                do with ‘work’ out of school. At a time when the meaning of work is
                becoming less and less clear, it is more necessary than ever to question
                the relationship between work and school, or rather, how work can



                9   For an elaboration see: Masschelein, Simons & Larrosa (2019).
                                             130
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135