Page 134 - Looking_after_school
P. 134

Looking after school: a critical analysis of personalisation in education

                tices for dealing with written words in such a way that they do still
                mean something, that the words are inscribed, and the school has an
                important role to play in this.
                Literacy - also through writing - always has in some way to do with
                the fact that letters are inscribed in the body, and that we become
                able to relate to language precisely because those letters have been
                inscribed. Perhaps we should ask ourselves what school-based meth-
                ods (including types of exercise and practice) we can develop so that
                what reaches us today in digital form and as digital images and what
                is presented as grammar of the digital could be inscribed and could
                mean something in terms of becoming something to relate to. Digital
                literacy, then, implies a kind of formation. Here we are pointing once
                more at the importance of the basic grammars of the internet, of the
                digital world, of visual culture (see also Dussel, 2018).
                But the importance of basic grammars and literacy is also always
                accompanied by the importance of authority, that is of a specific ped-
                agogical authority. Not institutional or police authority, but author-
                ity in the sense that something ‘tells’ us something, or ‘has to tell’ us
                something in the strong sense of the word and thus acquires lasting
                meaning. Something can only inscribe itself, and play a role in for-
                mation, if it has something to say, if it generates a (shared) interest.
                As with writing, this inscription has not automatically been the case
                with digital (image) culture. It requires methods and specific school-
                work, and perhaps also teachers who can make something (from the
                world) speak, to give it authority so that it can be inscribed. Rather
                than focusing on increasing the (limited) motivation of young people,
                schools and teachers can focus on new methods that can make the
                world speak (again), that can arouse interest and that can make what
                is said and shown also instil a lasting impression (see also Vlieghe &
                Zamojski 2019).

                This also means that the training, and perhaps especially the school-
                ing, of teachers is important. In addition to a training in pedagogy,
                didactics, and subject matter, perhaps something like school studies is
                also important for teachers. This at least would give them the oppor-
                tunity to relate to the world of school, to be concerned about it, to take
                care of it, and to thus play a role in the renewal of that world.


                                             134
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139