Page 90 - Looking_after_school
P. 90

Looking after school: a critical analysis of personalisation in education

                do something, to allow them to become and to remain students, and
                thus to avoid a turn towards the fatalistic, non-pedagogical experience
                of ‘being incapable of’ something. Part of this challenge is to remind
                young people that they are not at home, that school life is not the same
                as family life, and that living a life as student is living a life of freedom
                and equality.

                Society as seen from within the school


                In so far as society organises scholastic learning, and thus does not
                determine the destination of the coming generation, the school calls
                for a specific kind of societal responsibility. The first question to ask
                is not what the school should do for society, but what society can do
                for the school (Bachelard, 1934/1967). It is up to society to determine
                what ‘contents’ or ‘materials’ are eligible for young people to shape
                their lives. Taking the school seriously as a school forces the societal
                debate about school content to go to ‘the basics’, and thus transcend
                private interests. A very uncomplicated way of speaking of the cur-
                riculum in this sense are the terms ‘literacy’ and ‘grammar’ (also see
                Stiegler, 2010).
                Society expects different types of literacy from young people: linguis-
                tic literacy (national and foreign languages), but also digital, techno-
                logical, practical, and scientific literacy. Being literate means that you
                have enough distance to this linguistic, technologic, or digital world
                in order to be able to relate it, that is, to use it independently, with care
                and creativity. Literate people are people who are not determined by
                what influences them, but who instead have learned how to relate
                themselves to those influences by making distinctions, naming them,
                and acting upon them. Digital literacy means, for instance, that you
                are not determined by what Google automatically does, that you know
                what the search algorithm does for you, that the basic practices of
                Google can be talked about, that you can distance yourself from it
                and use it ‘critically’ and ‘with care’. An indifferent, careless relation
                now becomes a relation which acknowledges and attempts to name
                differences that matter and require concern. Literacy here means that
                certain ‘letters’ have been inscribed and become part of one’s way of
                talking, looking, moving, and writing. One could speak here about


                                              90
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95