Page 95 - Looking_after_school
P. 95

3. Touchstones: pedagogical articulations

                The value, however, resides on the side of the working student. The
                expression of “undefined work of freedom” articulates very well what
                is at stake in schoolwork (Foucault, 2007). School practice or exercise
                always has this indetermination (it is defined neither by an input nor
                                                       5
                by an output), it is work which is undefined.   At this point the engage-
                ment with grammar in schoolwork is crucial; a grammar is not defin-
                ing (like a norm, for example), but opening up possibilities. This is not
                to say that schoolwork does not have an aim. Schoolwork on writing,
                reading, calculation, or drawing is about creating conditions for some-
                one to be(come) able to write, to read, to calculate, or to draw; these
                school specific aims of literacy, however, are different from attempts
                to produce writers, mathematicians, artists, etc. Schoolwork is about
                becoming able, and giving oneself a shape, not about predetermining
                the actualisation of these abilities in view of a defined form or image
                of the educated subject.

                  Try again

                What is equally important to turn someone into a school student is
                the expression ‘try again’. The expression articulates a sense of opti-
                mism, a belief in the student’s abilities notwithstanding someone’s
                past. It also expresses patience. ‘Try again’ is about giving someone a
                second chance, or even a third or fourth chance. It means reinforcing
                the belief that everyone can learn everything, and intervening to pro-
                tect the student from the influence of natural or social forces which
                seek to determine the student’s abilities. The verbal intervention ‘try
                again’ interrupts the linear timeline where the student’s past deter-
                mines the student’s future; when emptying this space from all sorts
                of profiles and all traces of success and failure, it creates a spacetime
                were someone can become a student again, that is, to arrive at the point
                to experience becoming able to do something. What the instruction
                ‘try again’ does is inscribe equality as a condition of school learning.

                This equality follows from the typical freedom of school learning. If
                the (social) position of young people is not defining (the future) from
                the onset, this means that everybody, regardless of where they come



                5   For an elaboration see: Simons & Masschelein, 2019.
                                              95
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100