Page 149 - Jurnal Kurikulum BPK 2020
P. 149

curriculum document. This formula has since undergone many revisions through the Reviewed
               Science  and  Mathematics  KBSR  and  KBSM  Curriculum  and  subsequently  the  KSSR  and
               KSSM. Currently all subjects use this rubric for writing learning standards.  Verbs in Bloom’s
               Taxonomy  indicating  the  hierarchical  mental  processes  are  used  as  a  base  (to  know,  to
               understand, to  apply, to  analyse, to  synthesise,  and, to  evaluate). Specific verbs indicating
               behavioural and measurable learning outcomes are grouped under each of this verb (Refer to
               Appendix 2, Table 1 for verbs used in cognitive domain and Table 2 for verbs used in affective
               domain). These specific verbs are called the meta representational verbs (Olson & Astington,
               1990; Asington & Olson, 1990). Meta representational verbs are classified into meta-linquistic
               and meta-cognitive verbs based on speech-act theory. Meta-linguistic verbs take the place of
               the verb “to say”, examples are to define, describe, explain, suggest. Meta-cognitive verbs is
               the language of the mind (Astington & Pelletier, 1998), it replaces the verb “to think” such as
               to  infer,  calculate,  deduce,  analyse,  predict,  hypothesis,  observe  and  assume.    Olson  &
               Astington (1990) and Astington & Olson (1990) advocated that to be able to talk about thinking
               is dependent on the use of these meta-representational terms which could be used to describe
               the process of thinking and ways of expressing thoughts.

                                                      EPILOGUE

                       Curriculum development is a progressive exercise, existing design needs to be pondered
               upon, weaknesses need to be rectified and innovations need to be contemplated in an on-going
               manner.    The  macroscopic  curriculum  design  and  microscopic  curriculum  design  in  the
               Malaysian National School Curriculum has undergone transformations since 3 ½ decades ago.
               The national curriculum has progressed from being more knowledge based to thinking based
               and value based. It has also evolved to be more prescriptive with clear and specific learning
               outcomes. The inclusion of assessment standard and performance standard in the curriculum
               document is another major transformation in the Malaysian education scenario. Changes are
               necessary  as  it  reflect  the  evolving  needs  of  the  society  and  disciplinary  knowledge  as  it
               matures.  There  is  always  elements  of  uncertainty  pertaining  to  the  impact  of  the  changes
               aspired. Outcome of change is usually only visible after some number of years. This can be a
               challenge as pessimism and objection will appear if the short-term success is not obvious.
               Persistence  and  patience  sometime  has  to  be  practice  in  order  for  the  change  to  take  its
               maximum effect. Curriculum will always face changes as it serves the purpose of educating the
               people, as context and society changes, curriculum will need to change. However, transition
               time need to be factored in, there is a need to take into consideration readiness of implementers.
               Care need to be taken as not to overwhelm the implementers but to change their mind-set in a
               positive way, in another word, change is necessary but it need to be managed well. Malaysia
               has  successfully  manoeuvre  through  three  major  changes  in  curriculum  design  which  are
               Integrated Design, Discipline-Cognitive Design and Standard-based Design. This experience
               which has been shared internationally prepares us for future exploration and deliberation of
               curriculum design to suit the dynamic needs of the nation and the people.

                                                     REFERENCES

               Armstrong, D. G. (1989). Developing and documenting the curriculum. Boston: Allyn and
                      Bacon.
               Astington, J. W. & Olson, D. R. (1990). Metacognitive and metalinguistic language: Learning
                      to talk about thought. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39, 77-87.
               Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014 a). Dasar Pembangunan Kurikulum Kebangsaan.
                      Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.


                                                           140
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154