Page 100 - fbkCardioDiabetes_2017
P. 100

76                                Cardio Diabetes Medicine 2017





              such  intervention reduces  risk  factors for  vascular   beta blockers for patients with diabetes in the chronic
              disease and yields many health benefits  (1).      ambulatory setting  and in the post-ACS population.
                                                                 With non cardioselective beta blockers that also have
              The pharmacological  interventions include that  of     alpha receptor–blocking  properties,  metabolic  mark-
              assiduous blood pressure and lipid management for   ers  may improve, although  the  clinical  relevance of
              all patients, and for patients at highest risk, angioten-  these differential effects remains unproved. Random-
              sin-converting enzyme (ACE)  inhibitors independent   ized trials of thiazide diuretics that included substan-
              of blood pressure and also daily aspirin.
                                                                 tial numbers of patients with  diabetes have  consis-
              Each component of the diabetic dyslipidemia profile   tently demonstrated CVD benefits.
              is independently associated with CVD risk, including
              increased small, dense LDL particles, increased apo-  In a subanalysis of the Antihypertensive and
              lipoprotein  B concentration,  increased triglycerides,   Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent
              and decreased HDL  cholesterol.  The  most recent
              guidelines from the AHA and the American College   Heart Attack  Trial (ALLHAT),  the  CVD  effects of
              of Cardiology (ACC) endorse the prescription of statin   chlorthalidone  compared with  both  lisinopril  and
              drug  and  intensity  predicated  on estimated 10-year   amlodipine were  similar  in patients with  diabetes or
              risk  for  atherosclerotic vascular disease,  indepen-  impaired fasting glucose, despite modest but statis-
              dent of  LDL  cholesterol  concentrations  or  specified   tically  significant increases  in  incident diabetes  as-
              LDL cholesterol or non-HDL cholesterol therapeutic   sociated with chlorthalidone use. A meta-analysis of
              targets.  For  patients with  type  2 diabetes, at  least   randomized trials  further supported  the benefits of
              moderate-intensity  statin therapy  is  endorsed  for   thiazide diuretics in the treatment of patients with di-
              all  patients with diabetes  exceeding  7.5% estimated   abetes. In the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes
              10-year  risk  for atherosclerotic  cardiovascular  com-  Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA),44
              plications. Intensive-dose versus moderate-dose sta-  which  randomly  assigned  patients to treatment  to
              tin  therapy  reduces cardiovascular  risk  further,  but   amlodipine, with  perindopril  added as needed, or
              a large  meta-analysis and  analyses of data  from   atenolol with bendroflumethiazide added as needed,
              several  randomized  clinical  trials have  identified an   the amlodipine-perindopril combination yielded a sig-
              increased  risk of new-onset diabetes  associated   nificant  13%  relative  risk  reduction   in major cardiac
              with  intensive-dose  statin  therapies  compared with   morbidity  outcomes in the 923 patients with diabe-
              placebo  or  standard care. Other drugs  like  fibrates,   tes, compared with atenolol-bendroflumethiazide.
              omega 3 fatty acids, niacin  have controversial ben-  The patients with diabetes have aberrations of plate-
              efits in reducing the cardiac morbidity and mortality   let structure, function, and activity, yielding in aggre-
              of the patients.                                   gate a prothrombotic milieu. In addition, absolute or
              Hypertension  affects  approximately 70%  of diabetic   relative aspirin resistance may occur in up to 40% of
              patients (twice the rate observed in nondiabetic sub-  patients with diabetes. At present. the ADA and AHA
              jects), with a steep graded association between blood   recommend daily  aspirin  (75 to 162 mg/day)  for  all
              pressure and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Fur-  patients with diabetes who have established CVD, or
              thermore, blood pressure targets for patients with di-  for primary prevention in patients with diabetes older
              abetes are more aggressive than for theoverall pop-  than 50 years of age for men or 60 years of age for
              ulation,  with a goal  of less  than  130/80  mm Hg  for   women.  Two  randomized clinical trials  currently  are
              patients with diabetes who can tolerate such aggres-  under way  to explore  further  the role  of aspirin  in
              sive management without undue clinical burden, and   the setting of primary CVD risk prevention in type 2
              a target of below 140/80 for all others. For example,   diabetes. A Study of Cardiovascular Events In Diabe-
              the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE)  ,   tes (ASCEND) &The Aspirin and Simvastatin Combi-
                                                             2
              which compared ramipril (10 mg daily) with placebo in   nation  for Cardiovascular  Events  Prevention Trial in
              patients at increased risk for cardiac morbidity, rami-  Diabetes (ACCEPT-D).Diabetes is  associated with an
              pril was superior to placebo in the diabetes subset of   increased prevalence of resistance to clopidogrel,  a
              3577 patients. Early in the course of clinical use, beta   prodrug requiring metabolic conversion that tends to
              blockers were judged to be relatively contraindicated   be impaired in diabetes, resulting in decreased circu-
              in the setting of diabetes because of concerns about   lating active metabolite.
              masking  hypoglycemia  symptoms and adverse  ef-   Oral  hypoglycemic  drugs  that are  used  in diabetes
              fects on glucose  and lipid  metabolism. The  results   as  to have effect on the coronary  vasculature  as
              of cardiovascular disease (CVD)outcomes trials have   well  as  the cardiac musculature.  Hence  this discus-
              allayed  these  concerns and support  the benefit  of   sion becomes more imperative to discuss these drug


                                                         GCDC 2017
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105