Page 592 - fbkCardioDiabetes_2017
P. 592

568           Tight  Glycemic Control Decreases Cardio Vascular Mortality
                                                             (Proponent)



              strating a link between autonomic imbalance, inflam-  Endpoints.Total and Cardiovascular mortality  were
              mation and CVD [3].                                unchanged withthe intensive regimens in ADVANCE.

                                                                 Another Meta-Analysis,  also using weighted data
              Can glycemic intervention reduce                   from each study rather than patient level data, added
              cardiovascular risks?                              the main UKPDS and the UKPDS obese sub-study to
              Five  large  studies  seeking  lower  glycemic targets   the results  of ADVANCE, VADT and ACCORD  [1].  It
              have been completed .                              showed a significant  10% reduction  in a Cardiovas-
                                                                 cular composite endpoint driven mainly by 16% lower
                                                                 risk of nonfatal MI and also no significant changes in
                                                                 all cause  or Cardiovascular mortality. Heterogeneity
                                                                 between the studies was apparent for all cause and
                                                                 Cardiovascularmortality, with ACCORD being the out-
                                                                 lier withunfavorable outcomes [1].

                                                                 Temporal relationships: the Legacy effect in
                                                                 the DCCT and UKPDS

                                                                 In the DCCT/EDIC follow-up, a broad composite Car-
                                                                 diovascular endpoint was reduced 42% (P¼0.02) and
                                                                 the composite  of  Cardiovascular death, nonfatal  MI
                                                                 or nonfatal Stroke was reduced 57% (P¼0.02). In the
                                                                 UKPDS follow-up, relative risk reductions after inten-
                                                                 sive treatment with Insulin or a Sulfonylurea were 13%
                                                                 (P¼0.007) for all-cause mortality and 15% (P¼0.01) for
              The earlier  randomized Studies  the DCCT in Type  1   fatal or nonfatal MI. These findings support intensive
              Diabetes and the UKPDS in Type  2 Diabetes both    management of hyperglycemia early in Diabetes and
              showed  that  intensive glycemic  control can reduce   predict that  studies may require  up to 10 or more
              Microvascular complications more  than  a conven-  years of follow-up to demonstrate benefits [1]. Alter-
              tional regimen. However,  both  failed  to verify  Car-  natively, the beneficial effect of intensive therapy on
              diovascular benefits. Specifically, the DCCT showed   the risk of Cardiovascular disease may be a result of
              a non-statistically significant 41% reduction of a broad   the reduction in the incidence of micro-vascular dis-
              Cardiovascular  composite endpoint accompanying    ease. Both Renal disease and Autonomic Neuropathy
              6.5 years  of  randomized treatment  achieving a 2%   have been proposed as risk factors for Cardiovascu-
              between-group A  differential [1].                 lar  disease.  To  the extent that intensive therapy  re-
                              1c
                                                                 duces these risk factors, Cardiovascular disease may
              The main UKPDS found 16% fewer (P¼0.052) fatal or   also be reduced[2].
              nonfatal MI events and 21% less nonfatal MI (P¼0.057),
              accompanying 0.9% lower A  during a 10-year period.   The  legacy  concept is  relevant  to the ADVANCE,
                                       1c
              Potential explanations for these inconclusive results   VADT and ACCORD  Studies, in which  participants
              include  low Cardiovascular  event  rates in the  rela-  with well-established  Cardiovascular Disease  were
              tively healthy populations studied and the failure of   intentionally  selected for Study. For  such  persons
              intensive  treatment to obtain nearly  normal  glucose   with long-term hyperglycemia and established tissue
              levels. In both studies, the participants were relative-  injury, glucose lowering may have little effect on es-
              ly  young  and had recently  diagnosed  Diabetes and   tablished Cardiovascular risk due to a legacy effect in
              in neither study were  participants required  to have   reverse. That is, just as the structural and functional
              Cardiovascular risk factors other than Diabetes. Both   changes of advanced  Diabetic  Retinopathy  and  Ne-
              studies achieved  A  levels  averaging  close to 7.0%   phropathy are not reversed by late glycemic interven-
                                1c
              with intensive treatment,  although glycemic control   tion, structurally advanced  Cardiovascular Disease
              deteriorated over time in the UKPDS [1].           may not respond well to Glycemic Control [1].
              In the more recent studies high-risk patients wereen-
              rolled and thus event rates were high. These studies-
              confirmed that Microvascular events can be reduced
              insuch patients, but also  failed  to show benefit  of
              intensivetreatment  on their  primary  Cardiovascular


                                                         GCDC 2017
   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597