Page 202 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 202

2       References


                        systems in a United Kingdom intensive care unit. Crit Care Med.     49. Keene AR, Cullen DJ. Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System:
                        1997;25:9.                                             update 1983. Crit Care Med. 1983;11:1.
                     31. Brannen AL II, Godfrey LJ, Goetter WE. Prediction of outcome     50. Malstam  J,  Lind  L.  Therapeutic  intervention  scoring  system
                        from critical illness. A comparison of clinical judgment with a   (TISS)—a method for measuring workload and calculating
                        prediction rule. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1083.       costs in the ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1992;36:758.
                     32. Kruse JA, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carlson RW. Comparison of     51. Beck DH, McQuillan P, Smith GB. Waiting for the break of
                        clinical assessment with APACHE II for predicting mortality   dawn? The effects of discharge time, discharge TISS scores
                        risk in patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit. JAMA.   and discharge facility on hospital mortality after intensive care.
                        1988;260:1739.                                         Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1287.
                     33. McClish DK, Powell SH. How well can physicians estimate mortal-    52. Noseworthy TW, Konopad E, Shustack A, et al. Cost accounting
                        ity in a medical intensive care unit? Med Decis Making. 1989;9:125.  of adult intensive care: methods and human and capital inputs.
                     34. Poses RM, Bekes C, Winkler RL, et al. Are two (inexperienced)   Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1168.
                        heads better than one (experienced) head? Averaging house     53. Boyd O, Grounds RM. Physiological scoring systems and audit.
                        officers’ prognostic judgments for critically ill patients.  Arch   Lancet. 1993;341:1573.
                        Intern Med. 1990;150:1874.                          54. Teres D, Lemeshow S. Why severity models should be used with
                     35. Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, et al. Multiple organ   caution. Crit Care Clin. 1994;10:93; discussion 111.
                        dysfunction  score:  a  reliable  descriptor  of  a  complex  clinical     55. Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, Judson JA, et al. Patient selection
                        outcome. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1638.
                                                                               for intensive care: a comparison of New Zealand and United
                     36. Le  Gall  JR,  Klar  J,  Lemeshow  S,  et  al.  The  Logistic  Organ   States hospitals. Crit Care Med. 1988;16:318.
                        Dysfunction system. A new way to assess organ dysfunction in     56. Rapoport J, Teres D, Barnett R, et al. A comparison of intensive
                        the intensive care unit. ICU Scoring Group. JAMA. 1996;276:802.
                                                                               care unit utilization in Alberta and western Massachusetts. Crit
                     37. Peres Bota D, Melot C, Lopes Ferreira F, et al. The Multiple   Care Med. 1995;23:1336.
                        Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential     57. Pearson G, Shann F, Barry P, et al. Should paediatric intensive
                        Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction.   care be centralised? Trent versus Victoria. Lancet. 1997;349:1213.
                        Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1619.
                     38. Dellinger RP, Opal SM, Rotrosen D, et al. From the bench to     58. Carson SS, Stocking C, Podsadecki T, et al. Effects of organiza-
                        the bedside: the future of sepsis research. Executive summary of   tional change in the medical intensive care unit of a teaching
                        an American College of Chest Physicians, National Institute of   hospital: a comparison of ‘open’ and ‘closed’ formats.  JAMA.
                        Allergy and Infectious Disease, and National Heart, Lung, and   1996;276:322.
                        Blood Institute Workshop. Chest. 1997;111:744.      59. Reynolds HN, Haupt MT, Thill-Baharozian MC, et al. Impact
                                                                               of critical care physician staffing on patients with septic shock
                     39. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation
                        with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal   in a university hospital medical intensive care unit.  JAMA.
                        volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress   1988;260:3446.
                        syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301.              60. Brown JJ, Sullivan G. Effect on ICU mortality of a full-time
                                                                               critical care specialist. Chest. 1989;96:127.
                     40. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, et al. Efficacy and safety
                        of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N     61. Zimmerman JE, Shortell SM, Rousseau DM, et al. Improving
                        Engl J Med. 2001;344:699.                              intensive care: observations based on organizational case stud-
                     41. Baker SP, O’Neill B. The injury severity score: an update.  J   ies in nine intensive care units: a prospective, multicenter study.
                        Trauma. 1976;16:882.                                   Crit Care Med. 1993;21:1443.
                     42. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Carnazzo AJ, et al. Trauma score. Crit     62. Rapoport J, Teres D, Lemeshow S, et al. A method for assess-
                        Care Med. 1981;9:672.                                  ing the clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of intensive
                                                                               care units: a multicenter inception cohort study. Crit Care Med.
                     43. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, et al. A revision of the   1994;22:1385.
                        Trauma Score. J Trauma. 1989;29:623.
                     44. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, et al. A new characteriza-    63. Sherck JP, Shatney CH. ICU scoring systems do not allow pre-
                                                                               diction of patient outcomes or comparison of ICU performance.
                        tion of injury severity. J Trauma. 1990;30:539; discussion 545.  Crit Care Clin. 1996;12:515.
                     45. Vassar  MJ,  Wilkerson  CL,  Duran  PJ,  et  al.  Comparison  of     64. Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Knaus WA, et al. The use of
                        APACHE II, TRISS, and a proposed 24-hour ICU point system   risk predictions to identify candidates for intermediate care
                        for prediction of outcome in ICU trauma patients. J Trauma.   units. Implications for intensive care utilization and cost. Chest.
                        1992;32:490; discussion 499.
                                                                               1995;108:490.
                     46. Vassar MJ, Holcroft JW. The case against using the APACHE     65. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Hannan DS, et al. Assessment of
                        system to predict intensive care unit outcome in trauma   injury severity: the triage index. Crit Care Med. 1980;8:201.
                        patients. Crit Care Clin. 1994;10:117; discussion 127.
                     47. Knaus WA, Harrell FE Jr, LaBrecque JF, et al. Use of predicted     66. Xigris package insert. Indianapolis: Eli Lilly and Company; 2001.
                        risk of mortality to evaluate the efficacy of anticytokine therapy     67. Warren HS, Suffredini AF, Eichacker PQ, et al. Risks and ben-
                        in sepsis. The rhIL-1ra Phase III Sepsis Syndrome Study Group.   efits of activated protein C treatment for severe sepsis. N Engl J
                        Crit Care Med. 1996;24:46.                             Med. 2002;347:1027.
                     48. Cullen DJ, Civetta JM, Briggs BA, et al. Therapeutic interven-    68. Manns BJ, Lee H, Doig CJ, et al. An economic evaluation of
                        tion scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of   activated protein C treatment for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med.
                        patient care. Crit Care Med. 1974;2:57.                2002;347:993.








              Section01-O-ref.indd   2                                                                                  12/10/2014   8:06:41 PM
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207