Page 203 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 203

References     3


                   69. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Clermont G, et al. Cost-  mortality after coronary  artery  by-pass surgery.  J Cardiovasc
                      effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the treatment of   Surg (Torino). 1995;36:1.
                      severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1.             88. Kern H, Redlich U, Hotz H, et al. Risk factors for prolonged
                   70. Morris PE, Light RB, Garber GE. Identifying patients with   ventilation after cardiac surgery using APACHE II, SAPS II, and
                      severe sepsis who should not be treated with drotrecogin alfa   TISS: comparison of three different models. Intensive Care Med.
                      (activated). Am J Surg. 2002;184:S19.                  2001;27:407.
                   71. Polderman KH, Jorna EM, Girbes AR. Inter-observer variability     89. Pittet D, Thievent B, Wenzel RP, et al. Bedside prediction of
                      in APACHE II scoring: effect of strict guidelines and training.   mortality from bacteremic sepsis. A dynamic analysis of ICU
                      Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:1365.                      patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:684.
                   72. Luce JM, Wachter RM. The ethical appropriateness of using     90. McLauchlan GJ,  Anderson  ID,  Grant  IS,  et  al.  Outcome  of
                      prognostic scoring systems in clinical management. Crit Care   patients with abdominal sepsis treated in an intensive care unit.
                      Clin. 1994;10:229.                                     Br J Surg. 1995;82:524.
                   73. Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR. Medical futil-    91. Ohmann C, Hau T. Prognostic indices in peritonitis.
                      ity: its meaning and ethical implications.  Ann Intern Med.   Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:937.
                      1990;112:949.                                        92. Bosscha K, Reijnders K, Hulstaert PF, et al. Prognostic scoring
                   74. Knaus WA, Harrell FE Jr, Lynn J, et al. The SUPPORT prognostic   systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intra-abdominal
                      model. Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospital-  sepsis. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1532.
                      ized adults. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for     93. Gates LK Jr. Severity scoring for acute pancreatitis: where do we
                      outcomes and risks of treatments. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:191.  stand in 1999? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 1999;1:134.
                   75. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators for the SUPPORT Project. A     94. Soran A, Chelluri L, Lee KK, et al. Outcome and quality of life of
                      controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients:   patients with acute pancreatitis requiring intensive care. J Surg
                      the study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes   Res. 2000;91:89.
                      and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274:1591.
                                                                           95. Halonen KI, Pettila V, Leppaniemi AK, et al. Multiple organ
                   76. Watts CM, Knaus WA. The case for using objective scoring   dysfunction associated with severe acute pancreatitis. Crit Care
                      systems to predict intensive care unit outcome. Crit Care Clin.   Med. 2002;30:1274.
                      1994;10:73; discussion 9.                            96. Chatzicostas C, Roussomoustakaki M, Vlachonikolis IG, et al.
                   77. Lee DK, Swinburne AJ, Fedullo AJ, et al. Withdrawing care.   Comparison of Ranson, APACHE II and APACHE III scoring
                      Experience in a medical intensive care unit. JAMA. 1994;271:1358.  systems in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2002;25:331.
                   78. Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding     97. Khan AA, Parekh D, Cho Y, et al. Improved prediction of out-
                      and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir   come in patients with severe acute pancreatitis by the APACHE
                      Crit Care Med. 1997;155:15.                            II score at 48 hours after hospital admission compared with the
                   79. Youngner SJ. Who defines futility? JAMA. 1988;260:2094.  APACHE II score at admission. Acute Physiology and Chronic
                   80. Selker HP. Systems for comparing actual and predicted mortal-  Health Evaluation. Arch Surg. 2002;137:1136.
                      ity rates: characteristics to promote cooperation in improving     98. Liu TH, Kwong KL, Tamm EP, et al. Acute pancreatitis in
                      hospital care. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:820.           intensive care unit patients: value of clinical and radiologic
                   81. Zauner CA, Apsner RC, Kranz A, et al. Outcome prediction for   prognosticators at predicting clinical course and outcome. Crit
                      patients with cirrhosis of the liver in a medical ICU: a compari-  Care Med. 2003;31:1026.
                      son of the APACHE scores and liver-specific scoring systems.     99. Imrie CW. Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis.  Can
                      Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:559.                       J Gastroenterol. 2003;17:325.
                   82. Chatzicostas C, Roussomoustakaki M, Notas G, et al. A com-    100. Ludwigs U, Hulting J. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health
                      parison of Child-Pugh, APACHE II and APACHE III scoring   Evaluation II scoring system in acute myocardial infarction:
                      systems in predicting hospital mortality of patients with liver   a prospective validation study. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:854.
                      cirrhosis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2003;3:7.              101. Reina A, Vazquez G, Aguayo E, et al. Mortality discrimination
                   83. Sculier JP, Paesmans M, Markiewicz E, et al. Scoring systems in   in acute myocardial infarction: comparison between APACHE
                      cancer patients admitted for an acute complication in a medical   III and SAPS II prognosis systems. PAEEC Group.  Intensive
                      intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:2786.      Care Med. 1997;23:326.
                   84. Staudinger T, Stoiser B, Mullner M, et al. Outcome and prog-    102. Ludwigs U, Csatlos M, Hulting J. Predicting in-hospital mor-
                      nostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the   tality in acute myocardial infarction: impact of thrombolytic
                      intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1322.      therapy on APACHE II performance.  Scand Cardiovasc J.
                   85. Guiguet M, Blot F, Escudier B, et al. Severity-of-illness scores   2000;34:371.
                      for neutropenic cancer patients in an intensive care unit: which     103. Chiang HT, Lin SL, Hsu HC, et al. Prediction of in-hospital
                      is the best predictor? Do multiple assessment times improve the   mortality in patients with myocardial infarction using APACHE
                      predictive value? Crit Care Med. 1998;26:488.          II system. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2001;64:501.
                   86. Shaughnessy TE, Mickler TA. Does Acute Physiologic and     104. Brown MC, Crede WB. Predictive ability of acute physiology and
                      Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scoring predict need   chronic health evaluation II scoring applied to human immuno-
                      for prolonged support after coronary revascularization? Anesth   deficiency virus-positive patients. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:848.
                      Analg. 1995;81:24.                                   105. Casalino E, Mendoza-Sassi G, Wolff M, et al. Predictors of
                   87. Becker RB, Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, et al. The use of   short- and long-term survival in HIV-infected patients admit-
                      APACHE III to evaluate ICU length of stay, resource use, and   ted to the ICU. Chest. 1998;113:421.








          Section01-O-ref.indd   3                                                                                  12/10/2014   8:06:42 PM
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208