Page 204 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 204

4       References


                      106. el-Solh AA, Grant BJ. A comparison of severity of illness scoring     comparisons  of  intensive  care  units  after  adjustment  for  case
                        systems for critically ill obstetric patients. Chest. 1996;110:1299.  mix by the American APACHE II method. BMJ. 1993;307:977.
                      107. Navarrete-Navarro P, Rivera-Fernandez R, Lopez-Mutuberria     117. Bastos PG, Sun X, Wagner DP, et al. Application of the APACHE
                        MT, et al. Outcome prediction in terms of functional disability   III prognostic system in Brazilian intensive care units: a pro-
                        and mortality at 1 year among ICU-admitted severe stroke   spective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:564.
                        patients: a prospective epidemiological study in the south of the     118. Pappachan JV, Millar B, Bennett ED, et al. Comparison of out-
                        European Union (Evascan Project, Andalusia, Spain). Intensive   come from intensive care admission after adjustment for case
                        Care Med. 2003;29:1237.                                 mix by the APACHE III prognostic system. Chest. 1999;115:802.
                      108. Cho DY, Wang YC, Lee MJ. Comparison of APACHE III, II and     119. Ihnsook J, Myunghee K, Jungsoon K. Predictive accuracy
                        the Glasgow Coma Scale for prediction of mortality in a neuro-  of  severity  scoring  system:  a  prospective  cohort  study  using
                        surgical intensive care unit. Clin Intensive Care. 1995;6:9.  APACHE III in a Korean intensive care unit. Int J Nurs Stud.
                      109. Cho DY, Wang YC. Comparison of the APACHE III, APACHE II   2003;40:219.
                        and Glasgow Coma Scale in acute head injury for prediction of     120. Cook DA. Performance of APACHE III models in an Australian
                        mortality and functional outcome. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:77.  ICU. Chest. 2000;118:1732.
                      110. Muckart DJ, Bhagwanjee S, Neijenhuis PA. Prediction of the     121. Miettinen OS. Individual matching with multiple controls in the
                        risk of death by APACHE II scoring in critically ill trauma   case of all-or-none responses. Biometrics. 1969;25(2):339-355.
                        patients without head injury. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1123.    122. Ming K,  Rosenbaum  PR. Substantial  gains in bias  reduction
                      111. Muckart DJ, Bhagwanjee S, Gouws E. Validation of an outcome   from matching with a variable number of controls. Biometrics.
                        prediction model for critically ill trauma patients without head   2000;56(1):118-124.
                        injury. J Trauma. 1997;43:934; discussion 938.       123. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Constructing a control group using
                      112. Lertakyamanee J, Somprakit P, Vorakitpokaton P, et al. APACHE   multivariate matched sampling methods  that incorporate the
                        II in a postoperative intensive care unit in Thailand. J Med Assoc   propensity score. Am Stat. 1985;39(1):33-38.
                        Thai. 1997;80:169.                                   124. Gu X, Rosenbaum, PR. Comparison of multivariate matching
                      113. McNelis J, Marini C, Kalimi R, et al. A comparison of predictive   methods: structures, distances, and algorithms. J Computational
                        outcomes of APACHE II and SAPS II in a surgical intensive care   Graphical Statistics. 1993;4:405-420.
                        unit. Am J Med Qual. 2001;16:161.                    125. Cochran WG, Rubin DB. Controlling bias in observational
                      114. Bhagwanjee S, Paruk F, Moodley J, et al. Intensive care unit   studies: a review. Indian J Stat, Series A. 1973;35(4):417-446.
                        morbidity and mortality from eclampsia: an evaluation of the     126. D’Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction
                        Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and     in the comparisons of a treatment to a non-randomized control
                        the Glasgow Coma Scale score. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:120.  group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265-2281.
                      115. Sirio CA, Tajimi K, Tase C, et al. An initial comparison of     127. D’Agostino RB Jr, D’Agostino RB Jr. Estimating treatment effects
                        intensive care in Japan and the United States. Crit Care Med.   using observational data. JAMA. 2007;297:314-316.
                        1992;20:1207.                                        128. Beale R, Janes JM, Brunkhorst FM, et al. Global utilization of
                      116. Rowan KM, Kerr JH, Major E, et al. Intensive Care Society’s   low-dose corticosteroids in severe sepsis and septic shock: a
                        APACHE  II  study  in  Britain  and  Ireland—II:  Outcome   report from the PROGRESS registry. Crit Care. 2010;14:R102.











































              Section01-O-ref.indd   4                                                                                   12/10/2014   8:06:42 PM
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209