Page 116 - Psychology of Wounds and Wound Care in Clinical Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 116

90   Chapter 4.  Quality of Life and Well- Being

               According to Draper and Thompson ( 2001 ), HRQoL is
           one of the most widely used terms in the health care profes-
           sion, being applied across professions (nursing, allied health,
           health economists, public health) and activities (e.g. research,
           medical ethics, health services management). Despite this,
           there is no consensus on definition, even at this level of speci-
           ficity. Different ways of conceptualizing HRQoL can
             therefore be found throughout the literature (Rapley   2003 ;
           Lach et al.   2006 ). As with QoL, definitions appear to depend
           upon the perspective and purpose of the clinician or
           researcher; for example, a surgeon is most likely to focus on
           HRQoL as a tool to assess health  outcomes  following life sav-
           ing treatment, whereas an epidemiologist will want to assess
           the  determinants  of HRQoL.
               Wellbeing is also sometimes used as a synonym for QoL,
           and again this is neither correct nor desirable. Well-being has
           been defined as:

               ‘a holistic, subjective state which is present when a range of feel-
             ings, among them energy, confidence, openness, enjoyment, hap-
             piness, calm and caring are combined and balanced’ (Pawlyn and
             Carnaby   2009 )
                   Although QoL and well-being inevitably overlap – both
           are subjective assessments and both refer to psychological
           states – and the terms are often used interchangeably, it is
           important to distinguish between the two. In essence, QoL
           refers to a person’s cognitive assessment of their overall stan-
           dard of living, or their ‘personal assessment of life satisfac-
           tion’ (Price and Harding   2004 ).  As can be seen from the
           WHO definition, QoL asks about an individual’s perception
           of what their life is like. In contrast, the term ‘well-being’
           refers to the presence of positive emotions and contentment,
           with the absence of long-lasting and persistent negative emo-
           tions (e.g. Zikmund   2003 ; CDC  2011 ). Well-being therefore
           refers to an individual’s emotional response to what their life
           is like. In essence, QoL (and therefore HRQoL) concerns the
           cognitive appraisal of an individual’s situation, whereas well-
           being refers to their emotional appraisal. This is a very clear
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121