Page 124 - Psychology of Wounds and Wound Care in Clinical Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 124

98   Chapter 4.  Quality of Life and Well- Being

                Both generic and wound specific measures of HRQoL
           which can be used with a wound population are therefore
           readily available. A recent review (Palfreyman et al.   2010 )
           found that generic measures such as SF36, NHP and EQ-5D
           did demonstrate that individuals with wounds had reduced
           QoL in comparison to the general population. However the
           ability of measures such as CWIS and CCVLUQ to detect
           changes in QoL as patients healed was found to be limited.
           This is in part because the measures all include questions
           only relevant when an ulcer is present, limiting their applica-
           bility following healing. CWIS was also criticised for
            attempting to be too broad in its application. The CWIS was
           designed to be applied to all chronic wound types ranging
           from pressure ulcer, through sinuses, diabetes, trauma and leg
           ulcers. Unfortunately the significant differences in impact
           seen between these different types of wound seems to have
           seriously limited the sensitivity of this measure. This under-
           lines the importance of specificity for increasing sensitivity to
           change and also underlines the importance of ensuring you
           choose the right tool when measuring HRQoL. For example
           Higginson and Carr (  2001 ) suggest a two step method to
           choosing and implementing a QoL measure in a clinical set-
           ting. The first step (choosing the measure) advises clinicians
           to answer ten questions about the measures being reviewed
           including the relevance of the domains covered, the similarity
           of the population and setting in which the measure was
             developed to the one about to be assessed, the reliability and
           validity of the measure, length of time taken to complete, and
           easy of use. The second step – introducing the measure into
           practice is considered later in this chapter.


               Measuring Well-Being

            Increasing importance is being placed on the well-being of
           the individual living with a wound, as evidenced by the intro-
           duction of an International Consensus Document (  2012 ) on
           well-being which has at its heart the aim of ensuring ‘that
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129