Page 204 - Psychology of Wounds and Wound Care in Clinical Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 204

Social Support  179

                 According to this model, concordance is regulated by the
           patient, who monitors their treatment in light of these five
           attributes. For example, a patient with a leg ulcer whose  ill-
           ness identity  includes symptoms such as pain, exudate and
           malodour will monitor the use of compression bandages,
           evaluating how this affects these symptoms. If the desired
           effect – reduced pain, exudate and malodour – is realized in
           the  timeline  the patient anticipates, so reducing the  conse-
           quences  of the ulcer (e.g. reduced mobility, embarrassment)
           they will maintain treatment behaviour because they believe
           the treatment is effective and has given them  control   over
           illness progression. If these symptoms do not reduce, then the
           patient may, for example, begin to doubt the efficacy of the
           prescribed intervention (Charles   1995 ) and stop engaging in
           treatment behaviours. As Moffatt (  2004a, b ) notes, a patient’s
           previous experience with wound care therapies will impact
           on their attitudes towards, and beliefs about those therapies
           and their subsequent concordance.
              Patients’ beliefs about their condition and aims for treat-
           ment re often at variance from those who are treating them;
           for example, clinicians may see healing as the priority, whilst
           the patient’s priority might be to reduce pain and feel com-
           fortable (Morgan and Moffatt   2008 ). Likewise it has been
           demonstrated that patients frequently fail to understand the
           underlying cause of their wound and that until this is tackled
           healing will not take place (Edwards et al.   2002 ). Awareness
           of these five cognitive dimensions can help the clinician to
           understand how the patient makes sense of their illness and
           its treatment, thereby promoting a more patient centred
           approach to care.


               Social Support

            Research suggests that positive social support is very effec-
           tive for boosting concordance (DiMatteo   2004 ).  Likewise
           a lack of social support can reduce the likelihood of  treatment
            concordance; for example, Stewart et al. (  2000 ) linked high
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209