Page 168 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 168

DRinKinG AnD DRiVinG AMonG ADoLESCEnTS  n  135



             19-year-old  drivers  had  a  least  one  sober   driver, nygaard, Waiters, Grube, and Keefe
             passenger  in  the  car.  out  of  16,694  alcohol-  (2003)  found  that  parents,  friends,  and
             related  crashes,  approximately  50%  of  the   peers influence a decision to get involved in   D
             fatalities were drunk drivers and 17% of the   drinking–driving  situations,  no  peer  pres-
             fatalities were passengers in the car (national   sure  to  drive  after  drinking  or  to  get  into
             highway  Traffic  Safety  Administration,   a car with a drinking driver was reported,
             2005). Youth who are involved with drinking   and convincing drinkers not to drive is dif-
             peers  are  more  likely  to  ride  with  a  drink-  ficult. in a study on adolescents’ propensity
             ing driver; however, riding with a drinking   to intervene among 2,697 5th- to 12th-grade
             driver  does  not  lead  to  drinking  and  driv-  students, girls were more likely to say they
             ing (Yu & Shacket, 1999). in a study of 4,380   would  talk  to  a  friend  about  drunkenness
             respondents, passengers of drinking drivers   and  would  take  a  friend’s  keys  than  boys
             were more than eight times more likely to be   (Flanagan, Elek-Fisk, & Gallay, 2004).
             14 to 18 years of age. Persons 16 to 20 years   Situations and locations associated with
             of  age  consume  more  alcohol  before  driv-  riding  with  a  drinking  driver  include  out-
             ing  and  have  one  or  more  passengers  with   door  settings,  cars,  restaurants,  homes  of
             them  when  they  drive  after  drinking  com-  friends, and other social activities (Farrow,
             pared with all other age groups (hingson &   1987;  Gibbons,  Wylie,  &  Echterling,  1986;
             Winter,  2003).  in  an  observational  study  of   Walker et al., 2005). Riding with a drinking
             471 teen drivers on 13 roadway sites around   driver is related to attitudes, peer influence,
             10 public schools, there was one or more pas-  and having an accessible ride (Davey, Davey,
             senger present in 239 of the cars, and youths   &  obst,  2005;  Gibbons,  Wylie,  Echterling,
             drove  faster  with  shorter  headways  than   1986;  Grube  &  Voas,  1996).  Factors  such  as
             general traffic. The presence of a male pas-  accessible  transportation  and  presence  of
             senger resulted in greater speed and shorter   others  who  disapprove  of  drunk  driving
             headways (Simons-Morton, Lerner, & Singer,   influence  drinking  and  driving.  Among
             2005). Smith, Kennison, Gamble, and Loudin   youth, there is a positive correlation between
             (2004) in a qualitative study on intervening as   associating with drinking peers and riding
             a passenger in drinking and driving queried   with a drinking driver (Grube & Voas 1996;
             52 youths about drinking–driving situations   Labouvie  &  Pinsky,  2001;  Yu  &  Shacket,
             and interventions. The findings of the study   1999).
             included  the  following  drinking–driving   intervention studies among youth using
             situations:  the  participants  were  entangled   video media have been focused on education
             with a drinking driver who was determined   to  avoid  drinking  and  driving  and  riding
             to  drive,  the  participants  were  endangered   with a drinking driver. Collins and Cellucci
             while riding in a car with a drinking driver,   (1991)  examined  an  alcohol  education  and
             and the participants were stranded because   media component among 52 11th- and 12th-
             they did not get in the car with a drinking   grade students. Knowledge on drinking and
             driver and had no one to turn to for a ride.   driving improved, and there was no effect on
             interventions  described  by  the  participants   attitudes or alcohol involvement. in a study
             were to persuade, to interfere, to plan ahead,   focusing  on  drinking  and  driving  preven-
             and to threaten.                         tion, Kuthy, Grap, and henderson (1995) pre-
                 Youth  passengers  offer  potential  for   sented 274 adolescents with a 20-minute slide
             exerting influence on drinking drivers and   show of graphic pictures of severely injured
             for  taking  responsibility  to  stop  a  drinker   victims of drinking–driving accidents. There
             from driving (Assailly, 2004). in a telephone   was  no  difference  in  the  reported  driving
             interview with 44 adolescents who had either   behaviors  between  the  immediate  postpro-
             driven while drunk or rode with a drinking   gram  and  a  1-month  interval.  A  25-minute
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173