Page 277 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 277

244  n  HOSpIce



              The  congruence  between  patient  and   in  hospice  spend  their  time.  It  was  found
           caregiver  reports  of  symptom  intensity  was   that  family  members  and  nurses  spend
   H       examined by McMillan and Moody (2003). The   more  time  with  patients in  hospice  than  in
           symptom intensity of pain, dyspnea, and con-  oncology  units  but  the  time  nurses  spend
           stipation was evaluated by both patients and   is concerned with “tasks.” If hospice nurses
           their family caregivers. Symptom intensity of   increased  their  time  with  patients  because
           all three symptoms were significantly overes-  of the increased need for tasks, then the con-
           timated by caregivers (p = .000). This overesti-  text has had little effect on the type of care-
           mation is the basis upon which hospice nurses   giving.  The  authors  note  the  importance  of
           base their clinical decisions. The authors note   time spent “being with” patients, not only in
           that this study has implications for the educa-  “doing for” patients.
           tion of hospice family caregivers.           The  time  devoted  solely  to  tasks  raises
              perceptions of the intensity of symptoms   the  question  of  whether  death  anxiety  is  a
           by nurses might be expected to be closer to   significant  factor  in  hospice  nurses.  payne,
           those of their patients than was true for family   Dean, and Kalus (1998) examined death anx-
           caregivers. In a study by rhodes, McDaniel,   iety  in  hospice  and  emergency  nurses  and
           and Matthews (1998), 53 hospice patients, with   found that the latter had higher death anx-
           a mean age of 69 years, were queried about   iety  and  less  support  from  their  peers  and
           their symptom experience with the Adapted   supervisors.  In  another  study,  support  was
           Symptom Distress Scale Form 2. The nurses   also  deemed  to  be  significant  for  hospice
           were  also  questioned  about  their  patients’   nurses  if  they  were  not  engaging  in  block-
           symptom experience. like the informal care-  ing  behaviors  when  confronted  with  the
           givers, the nurses in this study overestimated   emotions of patients (Booth, Maguire, Behir,
           the symptom intensity of their patients. The   Butterworth, & Hillier, 1996). Death anxiety
           authors note that this is congruent with some   can  be  reduced  for  student  nurses  through
           other  findings  of  overestimation  but  con-  educational  experiences,  as  Mallory  (2003)
           flicted with findings of underestimation, par-  demonstrated.
           ticularly with regard to perceptions of pain.   research  demonstrating  the  interest
           Indeed,  McMillan  (1996)  demonstrated  that   and  need  for  advanced  education  for  hos-
           pain  was  still  not  well  managed  in  cancer   pice nurses had the additional benefit of pro-
           patients.  The  importance  of  the  instrument   viding  information  to  nurses  interested  in
           as  a  reliable  means  of  assessing  symptoms   hospice as a career (Wright, 2001). Although
           resulted in the incorporation of the Adapted   education  and  professional  development
           Symptom Distress Scale Form 2 into the clin-  have always been considered important for
           ical practice of the nurses.             hospice  nurses  as  for  all  nurses,  Metcalfe,
              QOl is an important concept in health   pumphrey,  and  clifford  (2010)  argue  that
           care. Hill (2002) examined both the measure-  hospice  nurses  need  education  on  genetics
           ment of QOl and how it might be improved   so as to be able to address the implications
           in hospice patients. This study, like that by   of  various  genetic  disorders.  In  particular,
           rhodes et al. (1998) underscored the impor-  the authors stress the need for such educa-
           tance  of  nurses  understanding  how  the   tion if nurses are to be aware of the psycho-
           patient  assessed  aspects  of  QOl.  Hill  indi-  social implications for families and patients
           cated that this knowledge was a guide to the   afflicted  with  such  diseases.  Their  research
           reflective practice of the nurse and assured   entailed responding to a questionnaire, and
           clinically  significant  improvements  of  care   although the response rate was low (29%), the
           for the patient.                         sample size of 328 provided a useful sample
              In an exploration of the context for care,   size  for  exploring  issues  of  the  importance
           rasmussen  and  Sandman  (1998)  investi-  and  confidence  to  address  various  genetic
           gated how patients in an oncology unit and   disorders. The development of knowledge in
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282