Page 528 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 528

STRUCTURAl eQUATIOn mODelIng  n  495



             dyad  risk  assessment  profile  to   determine   relationships. It is used interchangeably with
             patient needs and caregiver concerns prior to   the terms causal modeling, covariance struc-
             discharge. Joan grant documented the effec-  ture  modeling,  and  lISRel  modeling.  The   S
             tiveness  of  her  problem-solving  intervention   theoretical issues are discussed in the entry
             in  reducing  stroke  caregiver  depression  and   on Causal Modeling. A description of the ana-
             improving caregiver perceived health (grant,   lytic issues when programs such as lISRel
             elliott,  Weaver,  Bartolucci,  &  giger,  2002).   or eQS are used will ensue.
             Rosemarie King has also been funded to eval-  Sem  techniques  are  extremely  flexible.
             uate the effectiveness of her problem-solving   most  models  of  cause  can  be  estimated.  In
             intervention  for  stroke  caregivers.  Tamilyn   some models, the causal flow is specified only
             Bakas was funded to develop and pilot test the   between the latent variable and its empirical
             Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit,   indicators, such as in a factor analysis model.
             which has shown evidence of content validity   This is known as confirmatory factor analy-
             and  satisfaction  in  stroke  caregivers  (Bakas   sis. In other models, causal paths among the
             et  al.,  2009).  The  Telephone  Assessment  and   latent variables also are included.
             Skill-Building Kit program is currently being   Conducting a confirmatory factor analy-
             tested in a larger randomized controlled clin-  sis  with  Sem  has  many  advantages.  With
             ical trial. linda pierce has been funded to test   Sem, the analyst can specify exactly which
             her intervention titled, “The Caring Web” for   indicators will load on which latent variables
             stroke  caregivers,  which  has  been  found  to   (the factors), and the amount of variance in
             reduce emergency department visits and hos-  the  indicators  not  explained  by  the  latent
             pital readmissions of stroke survivors (pierce,   variable  (due  to  error  in  either  measure-
             Steiner,  Khuder,  govoni,  &  horn,  2009).  All   ment  or  model  specification)  is  estimated.
             of these studies show great potential toward   Correlations  between  latent  variables  and
             improving the care and well-being of families   among errors associated with the indicators
             of stroke survivors.                     can  be  estimated  and  examined.  Statistics
                 now is a very fruitful time for nurses to   that describe the fit of the model with the data
             conduct  research  in  the  area  of  stroke  and   allow  the  analyst  to  evaluate  the  adequacy
             stroke caregivers. With stroke being a lead-  of  the  factor  structure,  make  theoretically
             ing cause of serious, long-term disability in   appropriate  modifications  to  the  structure
             the United States, it is imperative that nurses   based  on  empirical  evidence,  and  test  the
             take  the  lead  in  developing  programs  that   change in fit caused by these modifications.
             improve  the  care  of  stroke  survivors  and   Thus, confirmatory factor analysis provides
             their family members.                    a direct test of the hypothesized structure of
                                                      an instrument’s scales.
                                       Tamilyn Bakas      An advantage of using Sem to estimate
                                     Staci S. Wuchner  models  containing  causal  paths  among  the
                                                      latent variables is that many of the regression
                                                      assumptions can be relaxed or estimated. For
                                                      example, with multiple regression, the ana-
                  Structural equation                 lyst  must  assume  perfect  measurement  (no
                                                      measurement  error);  however,  with  Sem,
                          modeling                    measurement error can be specified and the
                                                      amount  estimated.  In  addition,  constraints
                                                      can be introduced based on theoretical expec-
             Structural  equation  modeling  (Sem)  is   tations. For example, equality constraints, set-
             used  to  describe  theoretical  and  analytic   ting two or more paths to have equal values,
             techniques  for  examining  cause-and-effect   are  useful  when  the  model  contains  cross-
   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533