Page 537 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 537

504  n  TELENuRSINg/TELEpRACTICE



           difficult  to  assess  the  overall  effect  of  tele-  health outcomes. However, across all of the
           health on clinical outcomes of care resulting   studies,  a  persistent  theme  emerges:  the

   T       in  mixed  findings and  some  unanswered   telehealth innovations that work the best are

           questions (Bensink, Hailey, & Wootton, 2006;   those that complement the existing nursing
           Dansky, Vasey, & Bowles, 2008; DelliFraine &   approaches.  Importantly  then,  this  finding
           Dansky, 2008).                           calls for an end to isolated telehealth appli-
              Research  examining  telehealth  in  sup-  cation evaluation and an initiation of more
           port of clinical nursing is still maturing. With   studies in which the telehealth innovation is
           some projects, say Brennan’s ComputerLink   examined as a component of, not apart from,
           work (Brennan, Moore, & Smyth, 1991), the   the  nursing  intervention  (Barnason  et  al.,
           acceptance of telehealth for clinical nursing   2009;  Kleinpell  &  Avitall,  2007;  Moore  &
           was realized only in the last decade (Heisler,   primm, 2007).
           2007,  2009;  Mohr,  Vella,  Hart,  Heckman,  &
           Simon,  2008;  Nahm  et  al.,  2008;  Sorensen,                      Josette Jones
           Rivett,  &  Fortuin,  2008;  Zolfo,  Lynen,
           Dierckx,  &  Colebunders,  2006).  This  rela-
           tively  slow  growth  is  a  consequence  both
           of  the  state  of  telehealth  applications  and   Telenursing/TelepracTice
           the  expectations  of  nurses  regarding  the
           nature  of  appropriate  interventions.  The
           World Wide Web is now several decades old   Telenursing is defined as the use of telecom-
           and the penetration of information technol-  munication  technology  to  provide  nursing
           ogy  into  daily  life,  although  accelerating,   services to clients at a distance. Telenursing,
           has yet to touch the lives of more than 80%   a  subset  of  telehealth  (see  Telehealth),  com-
           of  the  American  public.  Additionally,  the   bines information technology to support and
           nursing discipline initially concentrated its   expand  professional  nursing  practice  from
           professional and scientific attention on face-  its  traditional  borders  by  removing  time
           to-face  encounters  with  patients  (Dansky,   and distance barriers to nursing care (Jones,
           Yant,  Jenkins,  &  Dellasega,  2003;  Darkins,   2001).  Telenursing  is  an  expanding  part  of
           Fisk,  garner,  &  Wootton,  1996;  gardner   health care mainly used to assess care needs,
           et  al.,  2001;  Johnson-Mekota  et  al.,  2001;   provide  advice,  support  and  information,
           Wakefield, Flanagan, & pringle Specht, 2001;   and recommend and coordinate health care
           Whitten, Cook, &  Doolittle,  1998). Nursing   resources (Holmström & Höglund, 2007).
           is now moving toward embracing informa-      Although  typically  associated  with  the
           tion technology to support and expand the   use  of  the  telephone  or  facsimile,  telenurs-
           delivery of care (Heisler, 2007; Lillibridge &     ing  provides  other  potentials  for  the  nurs-
           Hanna,  2009;  Rajasekaran  et  al.,  2009;   ing  practice.  A  small  but  persuasive  set
           Sorensen  et  al.,  2008).  Investigations  into   of  research   projects  (Beebe  et  al.,  2008;
           the use of telehealth for the delivery of pro-  Ernesäter,  Holmström,  &  Engström,  2009;
           fessional nursing interventions (Brennan &   Hagan,  Morin,  &  Lepine,  2000;  Hanson  &
           Ripich, 1994; Brennan, Moore, & Smyth, 1995;   Clarke,  2000;  Hanson,  Tetley,  &  Shewan,
           Brennan  et  al.,  2001;  Cady,  Finkelstein,  &     2000;  Hayes,  Duffey,  Dunbar,  Wages,  &
           Kelly,  2009;  Fincher,  Ward,  Dawkins,   Holbrook,  1998;  Jerant,  Azari,  Martinez,
           Magee,  &  Willson,  2009;  Heyn  Billipp,   &  Nesbitt,  2003;  Johnson-Mekota  et  al.,
           2001; Wakefield et al., 2008; Zimmerman &   2001;  Kaminsky,  Carlsson,  Hoglund,  &
           Barnason,  2007)  demonstrate  the  feasibil-  Holmstrom,   2010;   Schlachta-Fairchild,
           ity  of  the  approach  and  the  potential  for   Elfrink, & Deickman, 2008; Whitten, Mair, &
           not  only  social  benefits  but  also  improved   Collins, 1997; Wootton et al., 1998) identified
   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542