Page 570 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 570

VULNERABLE PoPULATIoNS  n  537



             variables  (Lexchin  &  Grootendorst,  2004).   opportunities as well as Healthy People 2010’s
             The  term  is  derived  from  a  combination   goals (Shi & Stevens, 2005; National Institutes
             of  Latin  words:  vulnerare  (verb)  meaning   of Health, 2000; National Institute of Nursing   V
             “wound”  and  populatio  meaning  “wasting   Research,  2000;  U.S.  department  of  Health
             or devastation” as well as populous meaning   and  Human  Services,  2000).  The  national
             “specific members of a region.” Aday (2001)   attention was in direct response to the World
             referred  to  VPs  as  societal  subgroups  in   Health  organization’s  Health  for  All  and
             the position of being hurt, ignored, and/or   Millennium Development Goals. The American
             helped by others. She claimed all members of   Nurses’  Association  defended  the  relevance
             human communities are potentially vulner-  of  VPs  for  nursing  research.  The  notion  of
             able. Flaskeraud and Nyamanthi (2002) con-  equality  and  health  presents  an  overlap  in
             tend that VPs have increased susceptibility   defining “health disparities” (among various
             to  health  adversities  due  to  discrimination   populations)  and  “vulnerable  populations”
             and  marginalization.  A  summary  of  those   as  applied  to  elimination  of  health  dispari-
             most at-risk include, but are not limited to,   ties  using  social  determinants  of  health
             women, pregnant women, infants, children,   (Guthrie,  2005;  U.S.  department  of  Health
             teenagers  and  young  adults,  the  economi-  and Human Services, 2000). As a result, the
             cally or educationally disadvantaged, ethnic   Institute of Medicine (2002) report reframed
             people of color, immigrants, prisoners, inter-  national  focus  that  VPs  experience  health
             national  groups  living  in  poverty  condi-  disparities especially in the unequal receipt
             tions, people living in disaster and war-torn   of  health  care,  specifically,  in  the  quality
             areas,  homosexuals,  HIV  infected,  chemi-  and  access  of  services  (Nyamathi,  Koniak-
             cally addicted, mentally impaired, homeless,   Griffin,  &  Greengold,  2005).  The  signing  of
             elderly, and those living in rural and urban   the National Health Care Reform Bill in 2010
             settings  (Flaskerud  &  Nyamanthi,  2002;   has  changed  the  face  of  health  care  receipt.
             Flaskerud  et  al.,  2002;  Leight,  2003).  When   The principles of social and distributive jus-
             coupled  into  subgroups,  the  appellation  is   tice, as it relates to resource allocation, are of
             “doubly” VPs (Liamputtong, 2007; Moore &   debate. For example, Frolich and Potvin (2008)
             Miller, 1999). The impact on health of being   proposed an inequality paradox for decreas-
             doubly  vulnerable  is  not  well  defined,  but   ing health inequities between socially defined
             legal  and  ethical  implications  for  research   groups. They explained an inverse care law:
             and intervention are presented (Fleischman   those  with  the  most  resources  at  hand  dur-
             & Wood, 2002). This has been most evident   ing crisis adapt more readily and are first to
             in studies pertaining to the effect of disas-  derive maximum benefit from interventions.
             ters  on  victims  (Gershon,  Rubin,  Qureshi,   The end result may lead to positive discrim-
             Canton,  &  Matzner,  2008).  An  interna-  ination, stigmatization, and inefficient public
             tional legal definition of VPs is found in the   health. The debate has not been entertained by
             Safeguarding  Vulnerable  Populations’  Act   leading agencies. In fact, Healthy People 2020’s
             of 2006 (Griffith & Tengnah, 2009; Schwehr,   national goals have not been released to date.
             2010). An interpretation of the United States’   The focus of the National Institutes of Health
             legal definition relates to susceptible individ-  is on genomics as related to health differences
             uals within specific subgroups and has not   among  various  populations  (Collins,  2010).
             changed since 2003 (Stone, Horton, Pestronk,   National  Institute  of  Nursing  Research  and
             & Ransom, 2003).                         American Nurses Association remain focused
                 Early  in  this  decade,  national  attention   on the art and science of nursing as it relates to
             has focused on VPs, as evidenced by National   positively influencing the health of VPs.
             Institutes of Health and National Institute of   Theoretical  perspectives  of  VPs  are
             Nursing  Research’s  missions  and  funding   rooted in the fundamental tenet of defining
   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575