Page 123 - ACCCN's Critical Care Nursing

100 S C O P E O F C R I T I C A L C A R E

4. Johnstone M. Bioethics: a nursing perspective, 4th edn. Sydney: Churchill 39. Sprung CL, Carmel S, Sjokvist P et al. Attitudes of European doctors, nurses,
Livingstone; 2004. patients and families regarding end of life decisions. The ETHICATT Study.
5. Tschudin V. The words private and costly certainly figure large in nurses’ Intens Care Med 2007; 33: 104–10.
work. Nurs Ethics 2002; 9(2): 119. 40. Bachman JG, Alcser KH, Doukas DJ, Lichtenstein RL, Corning AD, Brody H.
6. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. New York: Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-
Oxford University Press; 2001. assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 303–9.
7. The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human 41. Sjokvist P, Cook D, Berggren L, Guyatt GH. A cross-cultural comparison of
subjects of research. Washington, DC: National Commission for the Protection attitudes towards life support limitation in Sweden and Canada. Clin Inten-
of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research; 1979. sive Care 1998; 9: 81–5.
8. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). National State- 42. Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA, Cain KC. Physicians’ and spouses’ prediction of
ment on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans. Canberra: Common- elderly patients’ resuscitation preferences. J Gerontol 1988; 43: M115–21.
wealth of Australia; 1999. 43. Ravenscroft A, Bell M. ‘End-of-life’ decision making within intensive care:
9. Bailey S. Ethically defensible decision-making in health care: challenges to objective, consistent, defensible? J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 435–40.
traditional practice. Aust Health Rev 2001a; 24(4): 27–31. 44. National Health and Medical Research Council. Organ and Tissue Donation
10. Staunton P, Chiarella M. Nursing and the law, 5th edn. Sydney: Churchill After Death, for Transplantation: Guidelines for Ethical Practice for Health Profes-
Livingstone; 2004. sionals. Canberra: NHMRC 2007.
11. Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (SA). 45. Becker P, Grunwald P. Contextual dynamics of ethical decision making in
12. New Zealand Ministry of Health. Operational Standard for Ethics Committees. the NICU. J Perinat Neonat Nurs 2000; 14(2): 58–72.
Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2002. 46. Coombs M, Ersser SJ. Medical hegemony in decision-making: a barrier
13. Health and Disability Commissioner. Annual Report of the Health and Dis- to interdisciplinary working in intensive care? J Adv Nurs 2004; 46(3):
ability Commissioner for the year ended 30 June 2002. Auckland: Health and 245–52.
Disability Commissioner; 2002. 47. Cobanoglu N, Algier L. A qualitative analysis of ethical problems experi-
14. International Council of Nurses (ICN) Code of Ethics. http://www.icn.ch/ enced by physicians and nurses in intensive care units in Turkey. Nurs Ethics
publications/position-statements/ 2004; 11(5): 444–58.
15. Nursing Council of New Zealand. 2004 Code of conduct for nurses. http:// 48. Murray M, Miller T, Fiset V, O’Connor A, Jacobsen M. Decision support:
www.nursingcouncil.org.nz/index.cfm/1,25,html/Home helping patients and families to find a balance at the end of life. Int J Palliat
16. Gulam H. Consent Tips for health care professionals. Aust Nurs J 2004; Nurs 2004; 10(6): 270–77.
12(2); 17–19. 49. Bailey S. In whose interests? The best interests principle under ethical scru-
17. Aveyard H. Implied consent prior to nursing care procedures. J Adv Nurs tiny. Aust Crit Care 2001b; 14(4): 161–4.
2002; 39(2): 201–7. 50. De Grazia D. Value theory and the best interests standard. Bioethics 1995;
18. Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479. 9(1): 50–61.
19. Rischbieth A, Blythe D. Ethics Handbook for Researchers, Australian and New 51. Bailey S. Decision-making in health care: limitations of the substituted
Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Clinical Trials Group (CTG), Mel- judgement principle. Nurs Ethics 2002; 9(5): 483–96.
bourne, Wakefield Press; 2005. 52. Wareham P, McCallin A, Diesfeld K. Advance directives: the New Zealand
20. Wallace M. Health care and the law. Sydney: Lawbook Co; 2001. context. Nurs Ethics 2005; 12(4): 349–59.
21. Human Rights Act 1998. London: Stationery Office, 1998. 53. Childress J. Dying patients:. who’s in control? Law, Med Health Care 1989;
22. O’Neill O. Symposium on consent and confidentiality. Some limits on 17(3): 227–8.
informed consent. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 4–7. 54. Choice in Dying. Choice in Dying: an historical perspective. Washington, DC:
23. Doyal L. Communicating and understanding risk. Informed consent: moral CID; 2007.
necessity or illusion. Qual Health Care 2001; 10: 29–33. 55. Wynn F. Reflecting on the ongoing aftermath of heart transplantation: Jean-
24. General Medical Council. Seeking patients’ consent: the ethical considerations. Luc Nancy’s L’intrus. Nursing Inquiry 2009; 16(1): 3–9.
London: General Medical Council; 1999. p. 2. 56. Bailey S. The concept of futility in health care decision-making. Nurs Ethics
25. McConnell T. Inalienable rights: the limits to informed consent in medicine and 2004; 11(1): 78–84.
the law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. p. 1–78. 57. Schneiderman L, Jecker N, Jonsen A. Medical futility: response to critiques.
26. Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRCNZ), Guidelines on Ethics Ann Intern Med 1996; 125(8): 669–74.
in Health Research, Auckland, March 2002, http://www.hrc.govt.nz/ethicgui. 58. New South Wales Health. Guidelines for end-of-life care and decision-making.
htm Sydney: NSW Department of Health; 2005.
27. Health Research Council of New Zealand. Operational Standard for Ethics 59. Buiting H, van Delden J, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Rietjens J, Rurup M et al.
Committees. Auckland: HRCNZ; 2002. Reporting of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the Netherlands:
28. Leppa C, Terry C. Reflective practice in nursing ethics education: interna- descriptive study. BMC Med Ethics 2009; 10(1): 18.
tional collaboration. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48(2): 195–202. 60. Wlody G. Critical Care Nurses: moral agents in the ICU. In: JP Orlowski, ed.
29. Hall K. Intensive care ethics in evolution. Bioethics 1997; 11(3&4): 241–5. Ethics in critical care medicine. Baltimore: University Publishing Group; 1999.
30. Oberle K, Hughes D. Doctors’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethical problems p. 513–46.
in end-of-life decisions. J Adv Nurs 2001; 33(6): 707–15. 61. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council 2002 Code of Ethics, http://
31. Luce J. Making decisions about the forgoing of life-sustaining therapy. Am J www.anmc.org.au/
Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 1715–18. 62. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS). The ANZICS
32. Orlowski J. Ethics in critical care medicine. Baltimore, MD: University Publish- Statement on death and organ donation (Edition 3.1). Melbourne: ANZICS,
ing Group; 1999. 2010.
33. Rocker G, Dunbar S. Withholding or withdrawal of life support: the Cana- 63. Ogata J, Imakita M, Yutani C, Miyamoto S, Kikuchi H. Primary brainstem
dian Critical Care Society position paper. J Palliat Care 2000; Oct16(Suppl): death: a clinico-pathological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1988; 51:
S53–62. 646–50.
34. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS). The ANZICS 64. Greer DM, Varelas PN, Haque S, Wijdicks EF. Variability of brain death
Statement on Withholding and Withdrawing Treatment (version 1), Melbourne; determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions. Neurol 2008;
2003 70:284–9.
35. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care 65. Wijdicks, E. Brain death worldwide. Accepted fact but no global consensus
for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158:1163–67. in diagnostic criteria. Neurol 2002; 58: 20–25.
36. Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee. Attitudes of critical care 66 Australian Government Organ & Tissue Authority. National Protocol fo Dona-
professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Med tion after Cardiac Death. Canberra: NHMRC; 2010, available from http://
1992; 20: 320–26. www.donatelife.gov.au/Discover/About-Organ-Donation/Types-of-
37. Asch DA, Hansen-Flaschen J, Lanken PN. Decisions to limit or continue donation/Donation-after-Cardiac-Death-DCD-Protocol.html
life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: 67. National Health and Medical Research Council. Organ and Tissue Donation
conflicts between physicians’ practices and patients’ wishes. Am J Respir Crit by Living Donors – Guidelines for Ethical Practice for Health Professionals. Can-
Care Med 1995; 151:288–92. berra: NHMRC; 2007.
38. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P et al. End-of-life practices in European 68. National Health and Medical Research Council. Making a Decision about
intensive care units. The ETHICUS study. JAMA 2003; 290: 790–97. Living Organ and Tissue Donation. Canberra: NHMRC; 2007.