Page 641 - ACCCN's Critical Care Nursing
P. 641

618  S P E C I A LT Y   P R A C T I C E   I N   C R I T I C A L   C A R E



            Research vignette, Continued
            number in this group or whether consideration should be given to   of  supervision,  diagnostic  accuracy,  quality  of  documentation,
            refining the role model and scope of practice. The role was also   appropriateness  of  investigations,  medications  required  and  an
            evaluated using a peer audit process of TENP documentation for   area  for  comments.  The  TENPs  were  rated  6–9  for  supervision
            appropriateness  and  adherence  to  policy  and  guidelines.  The   requirements  and  7–9  for  diagnostic  accuracy,  documentation
            audits  examined  components  of  history,  examination,  investiga-  quality,  medications  required  and  investigations  and  pathology
            tion,  diagnostic  interpretation,  management  plans,  patient  dis-  ordered. Once again the exact number of surveys conducted was
            position  and  patient  referral.  Audit  scores  ranged  from  22–25   not reported and validation of the survey tool was not described.
            (maximum possible audit score was 25). The number of documen-  Unfortunately, patient satisfaction of the role, and representation
            tation audits conducted was not stated, and an in-depth descrip-  rates of patients treated by the TENPs, were not studied.
            tion or validity testing of the audit tool were not discussed. The   Overall, this paper detailed a framework and scope of practice for
            latter is another topic of potential research.
                                                              the successful implementation of a TENP role. Other emergency
            Evaluation also included a survey of the TENP work performance   departments  wishing  to  implement  extended  nursing  practice
            by  5  senior  emergency  physicians,  using  a  10-point  scale  (10  =   roles  could  consider  the  implementation  described  here.  The
            minimal supervision required and/or patient management perfor-  paper  also  supports  the  benefits,  safety  and  success  of  the
            mance by the TENP was appropriate). The survey examined levels   extended nursing practice roles.




            Learning activities

             1.  Review  your  department’s  plan  for  the  management  of  a   7.  Are there specific antidotes for organophosphate poisoning?
               potentially chemical-contaminated patient.        Explain your answer.
             2.  Outline what PPE your department has available for staff use.  8.  Outline the effects of atropine administration in the context of
             3.  Describe  the  routes  by  which  organophosphates  can  be   this poisoning. What are the endpoints for atropine therapy?
               absorbed.                                       9.  How does pralidoxime work?
             4.  In the case study, why did Maria have her clothing removed   10.  Outline  the  preparation  for  the  safe  transport  of  critically
               and then washed with soapy water before entering the ED?  unwell patients. Consider in your response the patient’s condi-
             5.  Given the symptoms described for Maria, outline the musca-  tion, the personnel required and the equipment.
               rinic and nicotinic effects displayed with the poisoning in this   11.  Maria’s family members requested to visit her during the initial
               case study.                                       management in the ED. How would you handle this request?
             6.  List the common acronyms outlining the muscarinic and nico-
               tinic effects displayed with organophosphate poisoning.


         ONLINE RESOURCES                                     REFERENCES

         American Emergency Nurses Association, http://www.ena.org  1.  Pink N. Triage in the accident and emergency department. Aust Nurs J 1977;
         Australasian College of Emergency Medicine, http://www.acem.org.au  6(9): 35–6.
         Australian College of Emergency Nursing (ACEN), http://www.acenl.org.au  2.  Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. National Triage Scale. Emerg
         Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, http://www.aihw.gov.au  Med 1994; 6(2): 245–6.
         Australian Venom Research Unit, http://www.avru.org    3.  Manchester Triage Group. Emergency triage. London: BMJ Publishing; 1997.
         Clinical Toxinology Resources, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, http://  4.  Australasian  College  for  Emergency  Medicine.  Australasian  triage  scale.
            www.toxinology.com                                    Emerg Med 2002; 14 (3): 335–6.
         College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), http://www.cena.org.au  5.  Whitby S. Australian Department of Health and Family Services, Liverpool
         College  of  Emergency  Nursing  New  Zealand  (CENNZ),  http://www.  Health  Service.  Analysis  of  the  process  of  triage:  the  use  and  outcome  of  the
            emergencynurse.co.nz                                  national triage. Canberra: Department of Health and Family Services; 1997.
         Commonwealth  Serum  Laboratories  (CSL)  Antivenom  Handbook  eMedicine,   6.  Kelly A, Richardson D. Training for the role of triage in Australasia. Emerg
            http://www.emedicine.com                              Med 2001; 13 (2): 230–32.
         Emergency Nursing World, http://enw.org                7.  Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services (CDHFS) and
         National Asthma Council of Australia, http://www.nationalasthma.org.au  the Australian College of Emergency Medicine. Australian national triage scale:
         National  Institute  of  Clinical  Studies,  Emergency  Care  Community  of  Practice   a user’s manual. Canberra: CDHFS; 1997.
            Project, http://www.nicsl.com.au                    8.  Kitt  S.  Emergency  nursing:  a  physiological  and  clinical  perspective,  2nd  edn.
         New Zealand Health Information Service, http://www.nzhis.govt.nz  Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995.
         New Zealand Ministry of Health, http://www.moh.govt.nz  9.  McMahon M. ED triage: is a five level triage system the best? Am J Nurs 2003;
         Poisons Information Australia, Phone: 131126.            103(3): 61–3.
         Poisons Information New Zealand, Phone: 0800 POISON or 0800 764766.  10.  College of Emergency Nursing Australasia. Position  Statement  Triage  Nurse.
         The Cochrane Library, http://acc.cochrane.org/           2009. [Cited September 2010]. Available from: http://www.cena.org.au/
         Best Bets, http://www.bestbets.org/                   11.  Australian College of Emergency Medicine. Guidelines for implementation of
                                                                  the Australasian Triage Scale in Emergency Departments. 2005. [Cited September
         FURTHER READING                                          2010].   Available   from:   http://www.acem.org.au/media/policies_and_
                                                                  guidelines/G24_Implementation_ATS.pdf
         Greenland  P,  Hutchinson  D,  Park  T.  Irukandji  syndrome:  what  nurses  need  to   12.  Department  of  Health  and  Ageing  (DHA).  Emergency  triage  education  kit.
            know. Nurs Health Sci 2006; 8(1): 66–70.              Canberra: DHA; 2007.
   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646