Page 2476 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 2476

Chapter 151  Hematologic Changes in Pregnancy  2213


            double  heterozygosity,  and  antithrombin  III  deficiency  were  at   recurrent  miscarriage,  anticoagulation  has  been  used  in  efforts  to
            highest risk. Given the increased risk of VTE, prophylactic anticoagu-  improve rates of live birth. There have been varied results in clinical
            lation is warranted.                                  trials using anticoagulation in the setting of recurrent miscarriage.
              Screening for inherited thrombophilia in patients with recurrent   However, in the large, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled
            miscarriage  or  pregnancy  complications  such  as  preeclampsia  or   study examining the use of aspirin or aspirin plus heparin in women
            placental  abruption  is  not  indicated.  Thrombophilia  screening  is   with unexplained miscarriage, there was no improvement in the live
            indicated only in patients with a prior thromboembolic event or a   birth rate compared with placebo. 210
            high likelihood of thrombophilia. Selective screening based on per-
            sonal and family history is recommended (see box on The TIPPS
            (Thrombophilia in Pregnancy Prophylaxis Study) Trial and box on   Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome
            Thrombophilia During Pregnancy).
              Prophylactic treatment of carriers of low-risk mutations with any   The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (Table 151.3) is the most
                                                                                                    211
            personal or family history of VTE is not indicated. In patients with   common  form  of  acquired  thrombophilia.   Antiphospholipid
                                                                  antibodies  include  lupus  anticoagulant  antibodies  and  anticar-
                                                                  diolipin  antibodies. They  can  occur  as  a  manifestation  of  various
             The TIPPS (Thrombophilia in Pregnancy Prophylaxis Study) Trial  conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other
                                                                  rheumatic  diseases,  infection,  and  drug  reactions.  Antiphospho-
             The TIPPS trial was the first large randomized controlled trial in which   lipid  antibodies  exert  their  prothrombotic  effect  through  several
             researchers  examined  the  effect  of  low-molecular-weight  heparin   mechanisms. For example, they inhibit the activity of anticoagulants
             (LMWH) in pregnant patients with thrombophilia and a history of on   thrombomodulin,  protein  S,  protein  C,  β 2 -glycoprotein  I,  and
             adverse pregnant outcomes or venous thromboembolism (VTE). The   prostacyclin. 212–214  They interact with phospholipids on the surface
             TIPPS investigators studied 292 pregnant women who were randomly   of platelets, increasing platelet adhesiveness and production of von
             assigned to dalteparin or no dalteparin. The primary objective of the   Willebrand mulitmers. 215,216  In pregnant patients, antiphospholipid
             study was to identify if LMWH prophylaxis in thrombophilic pregnant   antibodies decrease levels of annexin V, a potent vascular endothelial
             women  results  in  a  greater  than  33%  relative  risk  reduction  in  the              217
             composite  outcome  measure  of  severe  or  early-onset  preeclampsia,   anticoagulant  produced  by  placental  trophoblasts.   Nonpregnant
             small-for-gestational-age infants (<10th percentile), pregnancy loss, or   individuals  with  antiphospholipid  antibody  syndrome  can  develop
             VTE. Dalteparin did not reduce the incidence of the primary composite   arterial  and  venous  thromboses.  In  pregnant  women,  antiphos-
             outcome in both intention-to-treat analysis (dalteparin, 25 [17.1%] of   pholipid  antibody  syndrome  can  manifest  as  thrombotic  events,
             146; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.4%–24.2%; vs. no dalteparin,   spontaneous abortion, preeclampsia, and HELLP syndrome, as well
             27 [18.9%] of 143; 95% CI, 12.8%–26.3%; risk difference, –1.8%;   as IUGR. 218–221
             95% CI, −10.6% to 7.1%) and on-treatment analysis (dalteparin 28   Antiphospholipid  antibodies  can  be  detected  in  5%  of  healthy
             [19.6%] of 143 vs. no dalteparin 24 [17.0%] of 141; risk difference,   pregnant  women  and  37%  of  pregnant  women  with  SLE.
                                                                                                                  222
             +2.6%; 95% CI, –6.4% to 11.6%). Major bleeding did not differ. More   Thrombotic events occur in approximately 5% of pregnant women
             minor bleeding was seen in the dalteparin group (28 [19.6%] of 143)           221
             than  in  the  no-dalteparin  group  (13  [9.2%]  of  141;  risk  difference,   with antiphospholipid antibodies.  All pregnant women with SLE
             10.4%; 95% CI, 2.3–18.4; p = .01).                   should undergo testing for antiphospholipid antibodies. Women who
              The conclusion from the study was that prophylactic dalteparin did   sustain recurrent spontaneous abortions or a thromboembolic event
             not  reduce  the  occurrence  of  venous  thromboembolism,  pregnancy   during pregnancy should also undergo evaluation for the disorder. A
             loss,  or  placenta-mediated  pregnancy  complications  in  pregnant   history of either vascular thrombosis or fetal loss coupled with the
             women with thrombophilia.                            presence of either lupus anticoagulant antibodies or anticardiolipin
              Some  debate  and  controversy  exist  regarding  the  trial  and  its   antibodies  establishes  the  diagnosis  of  antiphospholipid  antibody
             conclusions.                                         syndrome. 223
             Cons: It took 12 years to randomize 292 women from 21 referral   False-negative  laboratory  results  do  occur  and  do  so  more  fre-
                centers. Some physicians raised concern over the amount of time
                it took to accrue the number of patients and the accuracy of the   quently  in  pregnant  than  in  nonpregnant  women.  This  may  be
                patient base it represents. Others argued that eligibility criteria   because of the increased concentration of clotting factors observed in
                                                                          224
                were based on a rationale that had already changed by the time   pregnancy.  Women with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome who
                the study was concluded.                          have sustained prior thrombotic events receive therapeutic anticoagu-
             Pros: The article confirms that women who are at low risk of   lation during pregnancy. Those with antiphospholipid antibodies but
                thrombosis should not be treated with low-molecular-weight   no manifestations of the clinical syndrome should receive prophylac-
                heparin and that this widespread practice should be stopped.  tic anticoagulation.
             Cons: Many of these women were women who would be placed in
                “lower-risk” categories to begin with, such as women who were
                heterozygous for thrombophilic mutations such as factor V Leiden
                mutation with one family member with a history of thrombosis.
                                                                   TABLE   Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome
                                                                    151.3
                                                                   Vascular Thrombosis
             Thrombophilia During Pregnancy                        One or more episodes of arterial or venous thrombosis confirmed by
                                                                     imaging
             A 25-year-old woman wishes to become pregnant. Her mother expe-  Pregnancy morbidity
             rienced  a  deep  vein  thrombosis  at  the  age  of  70  years,  underwent   Death of a fetus beyond 10 weeks of gestation with normal fetal
             thrombophilia  evaluation, and  was  found to  be  heterozygous for  the   morphology
             factor  V  Leiden  mutation.  She  herself  has  never  had  a  thrombotic   Premature birth before 34 weeks of gestation
             episode, just recently discontinued her birth control, and was told to   Three or more consecutive spontaneous abortions before 10 weeks of
             see  a  hematologist  before  she  became  pregnant.  Her  primary  care
             physician  tested  her  for  factor  V  Leiden,  and  she  was  found  to  be   gestation
             heterozygous  for  the  mutation.  She  is  asking  if  she  should  be  on   Laboratory criteria (all measured on two or more occasions at least
             anticoagulation during her pregnancy.                   12 weeks apart)
              Every case of thrombophilia during pregnancy needs to be assessed   Lupus anticoagulant on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart
             on a case-by-case basis. Asymptomatic women who harbor thrombo-  Anticardiolipin antibody
             philic conditions but have never manifested clinical manifestations do   Anti-B 2  glycoprotein IgM or IgG
             not require anticoagulation.                          Ig, Immunoglobulin.
   2471   2472   2473   2474   2475   2476   2477   2478   2479   2480   2481