Page 62 - Williams Hematology ( PDFDrive )
P. 62

38             Part I:  Clinical Evaluation of the Patient                                                                                                                       Chapter 3:  Examination of the Marrow              39




               structures thus sensitively detecting GPI-linked protein expression in     29.  Akoury DA, Seo JJ, James CD, Zaki SR: RT-PCR detection of mRNA recovered from
               multiple cell  lineages. Guidelines for  standardized PNH  flow assays   archival glass slide smears. Mod Pathol 6:195–200, 1993.
               have been published  and these assays are readily set up in clinical      30.  Hyun BH, Stevenson AJ, Hanau CA: Fundamentals of bone marrow examination.
                               94
                                                                         Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 8:651–663, 1994.
               laboratories.                                            31.  Moosavi H, Lichtman MA, Donnelly JA, Churukian CJ: Plastic-embedded human
                                                                         marrow biopsy specimens: improved histochemical methods.  Arch Pathol Lab Med
                                                                         105:269–273, 1981.
                                                                        32.  Wang J, Wiess L, Chang K, et al: Diagnostic utility of bilateral bone marrow examina-
               REFERENCES                                                tion: Significance of morphologic and ancillary technique study in malignancy. Cancer
                                                                         94:1522–1531, 2002.
                 1.  Arinkin M: Die intravital Untersuchungsmethodik des Knockenmarks. Folia Haematol     33.  Cheson B, Horning S, Coiffier B, et al: Report of an international workshop to stan-
                  (Frankf) 38:233, 1929,  reproduced in Lichtman MA, Spivak JL, Boxer LA, et al: Hema-  dardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International
                  tology: Landmark Papers of the Twentieth Century. English translation p 824. Academic   Working Group. J Clin Oncol 17: 1244, 1999.
                  Press, New York, 2000.                                34.  Bishop PW,  McNally K, Harris M: Audit of  bone marrow trephines.  J Clin Pathol
                 2.  Lee SH, Erber WN, Porwit A, et al: ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone   45:1105–1108, 1992.
                  marrow specimens and reports. Int J Lab Hematol 30:349–364, 2008.    35.  Humphries J: Dry tap bone marrow aspiration: Clinical significance. Am J Hematol
                 3.  Riley RS, Hogan TF, Pavot DR, et al: A pathologist’s perspective on bone marrow aspi-  35:247–250, 1990.
                  ration and biopsy: I. Performing a bone marrow examination. J Clin Lab Anal 18:70–90,     36.  Ozkaynak MF, Scribano P, Gomperts E, et al: Comparative evaluation of the bone mar-
                  2004.                                                  row by the volumetric method, particle smears, and biopsies in pediatric disorders. Am
                 4.  Bain BJ, Bailey K: Pitfalls in obtaining and interpreting bone marrow aspirates: To err is   J Hematol 29:144–147, 1988.
                  human. J Clin Pathol 64:373–379, 2011.                37.  Hartsock RJ, Smith EB, Petty CS: Normal variations with aging of the amount of hemo-
                 5.  Wilkins BS: Pitfalls in bone marrow pathology: Avoiding errors in bone marrow tre-  poietic tissue in bone marrow from the anterior iliac crest. Am J Clin Pathol 43:326,
                  phine biopsy diagnosis. J Clin Pathol 64:380–386, 2011.  1965.
                 6.  Sabharwal BD, Malhotra V, Aruna S, Grewal R: Comparative evaluation of bone mar-    38.  Tuzuner N, Cox C, Rowe JM, Bennett JM: Bone marrow cellularity in myeloid stem cell
                  row aspirate particle smears, imprints and biopsy sections. J Postgrad Med 36:194–198,   disorders: Impact of age correction. Leuk Res 18:559–564, 1994.
                  1990.                                                 39.  Tuzuner N, Bennett JM: Reference standards for bone marrow cellularity. Leuk Res
                 7.  Pasquale D, Chikkappa G: Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle   18:645–647, 1994.
                  smears, biopsy imprints, and biopsy sections. Am J Hematol 22:381–389, 1986.    40.  Gruppo RA, Lampkin BC, Granger S: Bone marrow cellularity determination: Com-
                 8.  Bartl R, Frisch B, Wilmanns W: Potential of bone marrow biopsy in chronic myelopro-  parison of the biopsy, aspirate, and buffy coat. Blood 49:29–31, 1977.
                  liferative disorders (MPD). Eur J Haematol 50:41, 1993.    41.  Abrahamsen JF, Lund-Johansen F, Laerum OD, et al: Flow cytometric assessment of
                 9.  Bain BJ: Bone marrow biopsy morbidity and mortality. Br J Haematol 121:949–951,   peripheral blood contamination and proliferative activity of human bone marrow cell
                  2003.                                                  populations. Cytometry 19:77–85, 1995.
                 10.  Inoue H, Nakasato T, Yamauchi K, et al: Risk factors concerning sternal bone marrow     42.  Holdrinet, RSG, Egmond J, Wessels, JMC, Haanen C: A method for quantification of
                  aspiration and patient safety in Japan. Intern Med 49:1089–1095, 2010.  peripheral blood admixture in bone marrow aspirates. Exp Hematol 8:103, 1980.
                 11.  Dunlop TJ, Deen C, Lind S, et al: Use of combined oral narcotic and benzodiazepine     43.  Batinic D, Marusic M, Pavletic Z, et al: Relationship between differing volumes of bone
                  for control of pain associated with bone marrow examination. South Med J 92:477–480,   marrow aspirates and their cellular composition. Bone Marrow Transplant 6:103–107,
                  1999.                                                  1990.
                 12.  Hertzog J, Dalton H, Anderson B: Prospective evaluation of propofol anesthesia in the     44.  Atac B, Lawrence C, Goldberg S: Metastatic tumor: The complementary role of the
                  pediatric intensive care unit for elective oncology procedures in ambulatory and hospi-  marrow aspirate and biopsy. Am J Med Sci 302:211, 1991.
                  talized children. Pediatrics 106:742, 2000.           45.  Janni W, Rack B, Kasprowicz N, et al: DTCs in breast cancer: Clinical research and
                 13.  Reeves ST, Havidich JE, Tobin DP: Conscious sedation of children with propofol is   practice. Recent Results Cancer Res 195:173–178, 2012.
                  anything but conscious. Pediatrics 114:e74-e76, 2004.    46.  Falck AK, Bendahl PO, Ingvar C, et al: Analysis of and prognostic information from
                 14.  Watmough S, Flynn M: A review of pain management interventions in bone marrow   disseminated tumour cells in bone marrow in primary breast cancer: A prospective
                  biopsy. J Clin Nurs 20:615–623, 2011.                  observational study. BMC Cancer 12:403, 2012.
                 15.  Hjortholm N, Jaddini E, Halaburda K, Snarski E: Strategies of pain reduction during the     47.  Terpstra W, Lokhorst H, Blomjous F: Comparison of plasma cell infiltration in bone
                  bone marrow biopsy. Ann Hematol 92:145–149, 2013.      marrow biopsies and aspirates in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 82:46,
                 16.  McGrath P, Rawson-Huff N, Holewa H: Procedural care for adult bone marrow aspira-  1992.
                  tion and biopsy: Qualitative research findings from Australia. Cancer Nurs 36:309–316,     48.  Montserrat E, Villamor N, Reverter JC, et al: Bone marrow assessment in B-cell chronic
                  2013.                                                  lymphocytic leukaemia: Aspirate or biopsy? A comparative study in 258 patients. Br J
                 17.  Degen C, Christen S, Rovo A, Gratwohl A: Bone marrow examination: A prospective   Haematol 93:111–116, 1996.
                  survey on factors associated with pain. Ann Hematol 89:619–624, 2010.    49.  Kang Y, Park C, Seo E, et al: Polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis of bone marrow
                 18.  Cannell H: Evidence for safety margins of lignocaine local anaesthetics for peri-oral   involvement in 170 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 94:3073–3082, 2002.
                  use. Br Dent J 181:243–249, 1996.                     50.  El-Galaly TC, d’Amore F, Mylam KJ, et al: Routine bone marrow biopsy has little or
                 19.  Odejide OO, Cronin AM, DeAngelo DJ, et al: Improving the quality of bone marrow   no therapeutic consequence for positron emission tomography/computed tomogra-
                  assessment: Impact of operator techniques and use of a specimen preparation checklist.   phy-staged treatment-naive patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 30:4508–
                  Cancer 119:3472–3478, 2013.                            4514, 2012.
                 20.  Voigt J, Mosier M: A powered bone marrow biopsy system versus manual methods: A     51.  Hofman MS: Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomogra-
                  systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. J Clin Pathol 66:792–796,   phy for evaluation of bone marrow involvement in lymphoma: When is it superior to
                  2013.                                                  biopsy? Leuk Lymphoma 53:349–351, 2012.
                 21.  James L, Stass S, Schumacher H: Value of imprint preparation of bone marrow biopsies     52.  Khan AB, Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, et al: PET-CT staging of DLBCL accurately
                  in hematologic diagnosis. Cancer 46:173, 1980.         identifies and provides new insight into the clinical significance of bone marrow
                 22.  Lewandowski K, Kowalik MM, Pawlaczyk R, et al: Microscopic examination of bone   involvement. Blood 122:61–67, 2013.
                  marrow aspirate in healthy adults—comparison of two techniques of slide preparation.     53.  Chang KL, Gaal KK, Huang Q, Weiss LM: Histiocytic lesions involving the bone mar-
                  Int J Lab Hematol 34:254–261, 2012.                    row. Semin Diagn Pathol 20:226–236, 2003.
                 23.  Helgestad J, Rosthoj S, Johansen P, et al: Bone marrow aspiration technique may have     54.  Marcus A, Sadimin E, Richardson M, et al: Fluorescence microscopy is superior to
                  an impact on therapy stratification in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.   polarized microscopy for detecting amyloid deposits in Congo red-stained trephine
                  Pediatr Blood Cancer 57:224–226, 2011.                 bone marrow biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 138:590–593, 2012.
                 24.  Tomkins DJ, Scheid EE: Effect of sample holding, cryopreservation, and storage on the     55.  Brouland JP, Audouin J, Hofman P, et al: Bone marrow involvement by disseminated
                  human lymphocyte cytogenetic test. Am J Ind Med 9:385–390, 1986.  toxoplasmosis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: The value of bone marrow
                 25.  Novotny JR, Schmucker U, Staats B, Duhrsen U: Failed or inadequate bone marrow   trephine biopsy and immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis. Hum Pathol 27:302–306,
                  aspiration: A fast, simple and cost-effective method to produce a cell suspension from a   1996.
                  core biopsy specimen. Clin Lab Haematol 27:33–40, 2005.    56.  Hussong J, Peterson LR, Warren JR, Peterson LC: Detecting disseminated Mycobacte-
                 26.  Neat MJ, Moonim MT, Dunn RG, et al: Fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis of   rium avium complex infections in HIV-positive patients. The usefulness of bone mar-
                  bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens; an additional tool in the diagnostic armoury.   row trephine biopsy specimens, aspirate cultures, and blood cultures. Am J Clin Pathol
                  J Clin Pathol 66:54–57, 2013.                          110:806–809, 1998.
                 27.  Breit S, Nees M, Schaefer U, et al: Impact of pre-analytical handling on bone marrow     57.  Agostoni C, Dorigoni N, Malfitano A, et al: Mediterranean leishmaniasis in HIV-in-
                  mRNA gene expression. Br J Haematol 126:231–243, 2004.  fected patients: Epidemiological, clinical, and diagnostic features of 22 cases. Infection
                 28.  Bock O, Lehmann U, Kreipe H: Quantitative intra-individual monitoring of BCR-ABL   26:93–99, 1998.
                  transcript levels in archival bone marrow trephines of patients with chronic myeloid     58.  Neubauer MA, Bodensteiner DC: Disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS.
                  leukemia. J Mol Diagn 5:54–60, 2003.                   South Med J 85:1166–1170, 1992.







          Kaushansky_chapter 03_p0027-0040.indd   38                                                                    17/09/15   5:38 pm
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67