Page 218 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 218

P1: PIG/  P2: OYK/
                   0521861241c04  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:54  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                   204                        Relations
                                   in which one object can be “strictly larger” than another. They are therefore
                                   sometimes called strict partial orders.


                                   Definition 4.5.3. Suppose R is a relation on A. Then R is said to be irreflexive
                                   if ∀x ∈ A((x, x) /∈ R). R is called a strict partial order if it is irreflexive and
                                   transitive. It is called a strict total order if it is a strict partial order, and in
                                   addition it satisfies the following requirement, called trichotomy:

                                                  ∀x ∈ A∀y ∈ A(xRy ∨ yRx ∨ x = y).

                                     Note that the terminology here is slightly misleading. A strict partial order
                                   isn’t a special kind of partial order. It’s not a partial order at all, since it’s not
                                   reflexive! You may be surprised that we did not include antisymmetry in the
                                   definition of strict partial order, since it was part of the definition of partial
                                   order, but it turns out that antisymmetry is implied by the definition. For more
                                   on this, see exercise 3.
                                     You should be able to check for yourself that P is a strict partial order and
                                   M is a strict total order. Perhaps you’ve already guessed from these examples
                                   that the reflexive closure of a strict partial order is always a partial order, and
                                   the reflexive closure of a strict total order is always a total order. You are asked
                                   to prove this in exercise 4.
                                     Reflexivity is not the only property for which we can define a closure. Exactly
                                   the same idea could be applied to symmetry and transitivity.

                                   Definition 4.5.4. Suppose R is a relation on A. The symmetric closure of R is
                                   the smallest set S ⊆ A × A such that R ⊆ S and S is symmetric, if there is such
                                   a smallest set. In other words, a relation S ⊆ A × A is the symmetric closure
                                   of R if it has the following properties:

                                   1. R ⊆ S.
                                   2. S is symmetric.
                                   3. For every relation T ⊆ A × A,if R ⊆ T and T is symmetric, then S ⊆ T .

                                     The transitive closure of R is the smallest set S ⊆ A × A such that R ⊆ S
                                   and S is transitive, if there is such a smallest set. In other words, a relation
                                   S ⊆ A × A is the transitive closure of R if it has the following properties:

                                   1. R ⊆ S.
                                   2. S is transitive.
                                   3. For every relation T ⊆ A × A,if R ⊆ T and T is transitive, then S ⊆ T .
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223