Page 230 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 230

P1: PIG/  P2: OYK/
                   0521861241c04  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:54  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                   216                        Relations
                                   S is reflexive. To see that S is symmetric, suppose (x, y) ∈ S. By the definition
                                   of S, this means that x − y ∈ Z. But then y − x =−(x − y) ∈ Z too, since
                                   the negative of any integer is also an integer, so (y, x) ∈ S. Because (x, y)
                                   was an arbitrary element of S, this shows that S is symmetric. Finally, to see
                                   that S is transitive, suppose that (x, y) ∈ S and (y, z) ∈ S. Then x − y ∈ Z
                                   and y − z ∈ Z. Because the sum of any two integers is an integer, it follows
                                   that x − z = (x − y) + (y − z) ∈ Z,so(x, z) ∈ S, as required. Thus, S is an
                                   equivalence relation on R.
                                     What do the equivalence classes for this equivalence relation look like? We
                                   have already observed that (5.73, 2.73) ∈ S and (−1.27, 2.73) ∈ S,so5.73 ∈
                                   [2.73] and −1.27 ∈ [2.73]. In fact, it is not hard to see what the other elements
                                   of this equivalence class will be:
                                      [2.73] ={..., −1.27, −0.27, 0.73, 1.73, 2.73, 3.73, 4.73, 5.73,...}.

                                   In other words, the equivalence class contains all positive real numbers of the
                                   form “ .73” and all negative real numbers of the form “– .27.” In general,
                                   for any real number x, the equivalence class of x will contain all real numbers
                                   that differ from x by an integer amount:
                                         [x] ={..., x − 3, x − 2, x − 1, x, x + 1, x + 2, x + 3,...}.

                                     Here are a few facts about these equivalence classes that you might try to
                                   prove to yourself. As you can see in the last equation, x is always an element
                                   of [x]. If we choose any number x ∈ [2.73], then [x] will be exactly the same
                                   as [2.73]. For example, taking x = 4.73 we find that
                                            [4.73] ={..., −1.27, −0.27, 0.73, 1.73, 2.73, 3.73,
                                                     4.73, 5.73,...}= [2.73].

                                   Thus, [4.73] and [2.73] are just two different names for the same set. But if we
                                   choose x  ∈ [2.73], then [x] will be different from [2.73]. For example,

                                            [1.3] ={..., −1.7, −0.7, 0.3, 1.3, 2.3, 3.3, 4.3,...}.

                                   In fact, you can see from these equations that [1.3] and [2.73] have no elements
                                   in common. In other words, [1.3] is actually disjoint from [2.73]. In general,
                                   for any two real numbers x and y, the equivalence classes [x] and [y] are either
                                   identical or disjoint. Each equivalence class has many different names, but
                                   different equivalence classes are disjoint. Because [x] always contains x as an
                                   element, every equivalence class is nonempty, and every real number x is in
                                   exactly one equivalence class, namely [x]. In other words, the set of all of the
                                   equivalence classes, R/S, is a partition of R. This is another illustration of the
   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235