Page 36 - REV T-I JOURNAL INTERIOR ISSUU 18 2-3

112 HIGHSMITH ET AL.

9. Lura DJ, Wernke MM, Carey SL, Kahle JT, Miro OG, Akdoğan S. A comparison of traditional
RM, Highsmith MJ. Differences in knee flexion prosthetic training versus proprioceptive neuro-
between the Genium and C-Leg microprocessor muscular facilitation resistive gait training with
knees while walking on level ground and ramps. trans-femoral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30:175-81. 2002;31:258-70.
10. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Lura DJ, Dubey RV, 20. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C,
Carey SL, Quillen WS, Mengelkoch, LJ. Short and Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Dever-
mid-distance walking and posturography with eaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA
a novel microprocessor knee. Technol Innov. statement for reporting systematic reviews and
2014;15:359-68. meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare
11. Sjodahl C, Jarnlo GB, Soderberg B, Persson BM. interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ.
Kinematic and kinetic gait analysis in the sagittal 2009;339:b2700.
plane of transfemoral amputees before and after 21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Pre-
special gait re-education. Prosthet Orthot Int. ferred reporting items for systematic reviews and
2002;26:101-12. meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ.
12. Darter BJ, Wilken JM. Gait training with virtual 2009;339:b2535.
reality-based real-time feedback: improving gait 22. Hafner B. State of the Science Evidence Report
performance following transfemoral amputation. Guidelines. Washington (DC): American Acad-
Phys Ther. 2011;91:1385-94. emy of Orthotists & Prosthetists; 2008.
13. Gailey R, Allen K, Castles J, Kucharik J, Roeder 23. Carey SL, Lura DJ, Highsmith MJ. Differences
M. Review of secondary physical conditions in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb
associated with lower-limb amputation and prostheses: systematic literature review. J Rehabil
long-term prosthesis use. J Rehabil Res Dev. Res Dev. 2015;52:247-62.
2008;45:15-29. 24. Neyeloff JL, Fuchs SC, Moreira LB. Meta-analyses
14. Mengelkoch LJ, Kahle JT, Highsmith MJ. Energy and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spread-
costs & performance of transtibial amputees & sheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive
non-amputees during walking & running. Int J data analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:52.
Sports Med. 2014;35:1223-8. 25. Agrawal V, Gailey R, O’Toole C, Gaunaurd I,
15. Kahle JT, Highsmith MJ. Transfemoral interfaces Finnieston A. Influence of gait training and pros-
with vacuum assisted suspension comparison thetic foot category on external work symmetry
of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: ischial during unilateral transtibial amputee gait. Pros-
containment versus brimless. Gait Posture. thet Orthot Int. 2013;37(5):396-403.
2014;40:315-20. 26. Isakov E. Gait rehabilitation: a new biofeed-
16. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Lewandowski AL, Kim back device for monitoring and enhancing
SH, Mengelkoch LJ. A method for training step- weight-bearing over the affected lower limb.
over-step stair descent gait with stance yielding Eura Medicophys. 2007;43:21-6.
prosthetic knees. J Prosthet Orthot. 2012;24:10-5. 27. Sjodahl C, Jarnlo GB, Persson BM. Gait improve-
17. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Lura DJ, Lewandowski ment in unilateral transfemoral amputees by a
AL, Quillen WS, Kim SH. Stair ascent and ramp combined psychological and physiotherapeutic
gait training with the Genium knee. Technol treatment. J. Rehabil Med. 2001;33:114-8.
Innov. 2014;15:349-58. 28. Sjodahl C, Jarnlo GB, Soderberg B, Persson BM.
18. Bellmann M, Schmalz T, Ludwigs E, Blumentritt Pelvic motion in trans-femoral amputees in the
S. Stair ascent with an innovative microproces- frontal and transverse plane before and after
sor-controlled exoprosthetic knee joint. Biomed special gait re-education. Prosthet Orthot Int.
Tech. 2012;57:435-44. 2003;27:227-37.
19. Yiğiter K, Sener G, Erbahçeci F, Bayar K, Ulger 29. Cole ES. Training elders with transfemoral ampu-