Page 55 - REV T-I JOURNAL INTERIOR ISSUU 18 2-3
P. 55

PREDICTING WALKING ABILITY AFTER AMPUTATION                      131



          finding a statistically significant association between   independent negative predictor of walking ability up
          patient “motivation” and the ability to learn to walk   to 18 years after surgery. A significant association
          with a prosthesis (5).                        between post-operative ADLs and walking ability
                                                        after rehabilitation with a prosthesis has also been
          Social Support                                described (5). Therefore, it seems the preponderance
            Webster et al. identified greater levels of baseline   of evidence suggests that independence in completion
          social support were associated with more hours of   of ADLs is a factor worth considering when deter-
          prosthetic walking and identified a need to build in   mining prosthetic candidacy.
          social support structures for patients that have lim-
          itations in this regard (18). Greater perceived social   Time to Rehabilitation
          support as a predictor of higher mobility was not a     Stineman et al., in two separate high quality stud-
          well-supported predictive factor in previous studies   ies, reported that patients who had early rehabilitation
          (5).                                          initially made higher motor gains than those individ-
          Smoking                                       uals who had later rehabilitation (21). Additionally,
            Wong et al. reported smoking was associated with   patients who received acute postoperative inpatient
                                                        rehabilitation, compared to those with no evidence of
          significantly poorer outcomes in diabetic transtibial   inpatient rehabilitation, had an increased likelihood
          amputation (TTA) patients (19). Czerniecki et al.   of one-year survival and home discharge. Prosthetic
          reported smoking status and reported a likely rela-  limb procurement did not differ significantly between
          tionship between smoking and a more proximal level   groups (22). Sansam et al. found a shorter time inter-
          amputation, which is discussed later. Although smok-  val between surgery and admission for rehabilitation
          ing is implicated in the etiology of many amputations,   is related to better walking potential. Similarly, the
          Sansam et al. reported that it is unlikely to have a   length of time taken from surgery to fitting for a
          significant impact on mobility outcome (5).
                                                        prosthesis is significantly associated with outcome,
          Stump Factors and Pain                        with those waiting longer having poorer walking
            van Eijk et al., in a medium quality article, reported   ability at one year (5).
          that the presence of phantom pain was significantly   Race
          associated with the ability to use a prosthesis (20).     In two high quality studies, race was reported
          Phantom limb pain specifically was not reported as a   as not significant in affecting the outcome of TTA
          predictive factor outcome measure in previous stud-  patients or being a predictive factor (18,19). Race was
          ies.
                                                        not reported as a predictive factor outcome measure
          Predictive Factors Supported with Two         in previous studies.
          References in This Literature Review
                                                        Vascular Intervention
          Independence in Activities of Daily Living      In a high quality study, Suckow et al. reported it is
            van Eijk et al., in a medium quality article, reported   possible, based on preoperative patient characteris-
          preoperative Barthel Index (BI) as a measure of one’s   tics, to identify patients undergoing lower extremity
          ability to perform basic ADLs. It is reported as evalu-  bypass surgery who are most or least likely to achieve
          ation of the functional status at baseline. In addition,   good functional outcomes even if a major amputation
          the preoperative BI was estimated based on history   is ultimately required. These findings may assist in
          taking and was significantly positively associated   patient education and surgical decision making in
          with prosthetic use (20). Further, BI was a signifi-  patients who are poor candidates for lower extremity
          cant indicator of the ability to complete the Timed   bypass (23). Wong et al. found indicators of poor
          Up and Go (TUG) test. However, Wong et al., in a   vascularity, such as absence of popliteal pulse and
          high quality study, found no correlation between   low Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), were significantly
          independence in ADLs and outcome in TTA patients   associated with poor clinical outcomes (19). Vascular
          (19). This is inconsistent with the previous report of   intervention was not reported as a predictive factor
          dependency for self-care prior to amputation as an   outcome measure in previous studies.
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60