Page 57 - REV T-I JOURNAL INTERIOR ISSUU 18 2-3
P. 57

PREDICTING WALKING ABILITY AFTER AMPUTATION                      133



          is related to residual-limb quality in general as well   intact knee joint for providing the TTA patient with
          as for specific bony aspects of the residual limb. A   the ability to return to high-level mobility activities
          tibial length of 12 to 15 cm from the knee joint line   following rehabilitation (31). Stineman et al. reported
          correlated with a better functional outcome than   ADLs and mobility (physical functioning) using gains
          shorter tibial lengths. Surgical technique and attention   in motor FIM™ scores achieved by rehabilitation dis-
          to the residual limb length ensures a more likely good   charge. TFA was associated with lower motor FIM™
          functional outcome after TTA (29). In a high quality   gains, but no direct correlation between amputation
          article, Suckow et al. reported TTA and transfemoral   level and prosthetic candidacy was reported. There
          amputee (TFA) patients were equally likely to ambu-  was no statistically significant difference in prosthetic
          late independently or with assistance (within groups)   limb procurement for the group who received impa-
          at hospital discharge. Between groups, however, there   tient rehabilitation compared to the group who did
          were significant differences based on level of ampu-  not (21). van Eijk et al., in a medium quality article,
          tation. Patients who underwent a minor amputation   reported amputation level (low versus high) was sig-
          were more likely to ambulate with or without assis-  nificantly positively associated with prosthetic use
          tance but less so than patients who did not have an   (20). Further, van Eijk et al. found level as a predictor
          amputation after lower extremity bypass (23). Linberg   for ability to complete the TUG test. Webster et al.,
          et al., in a high quality article, reported a significant   in a high quality article, reported TFA patients were
          difference in 6MWT performance between bilateral   significantly less likely to achieve prosthetic fitting
          TTA patients and TFA patients, with bilateral TTA   success at one year (18). Wezenberg et al. reported
          patients walking further (12). Chin et al. reported, in   that the level of amputation was not associated with
          a medium quality study, solely on the hip disarticu-  VO2 peak (28). Sansam et al. previously found that
          lation amputee (HDA), where older HDA patients in   the majority of studies reported better walking ability
          good physical condition and with a low prevalence   and greater ability to achieve ADLs after distal and
          of comorbidities were able to successfully walk with   unilateral amputations compared with more proxi-
          a prosthesis in a community setting (10). Czerniecki   mal or bilateral amputations. At this time, it seems
          et al. reported the rates of success were similar: 35%,   the preponderance of evidence suggests that level
          31%, and 33% of amputees with transmetatarsal (TM),   of amputation is a factor in determining prosthetic
          TTA, and TFA, respectively, achieved mobility success   ability but not a preclusion from candidacy. Finally,
          when seen in a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation   having more intact joints (i.e., having an intact knee
          unit (27). Fortington et al. reported poorer perfor-  compared with not having it) is consistent with a
          mance by people with a TFA versus TTA. Slower   higher potential level of function in TTA patients.
          five-meter walk tests and fewer steps taken per day   Moreover, the longer the transtibial residual limb,
          were reported one year after amputation. One year   the greater potential there is for increased functional
          after discharge, people with TFA or TTA increased   level. It is noteworthy, however, that having a long
          the number of steps taken per day from 570 steps at   TTA is not requisite for achieving community ambu-
          discharge to 1314 steps and were able to maintain   lation, as those with HDA can achieve community
          this level in the second year (30). Grameaux et al.   ambulation as well.
          did not find a statistically significant worse result
          in bioenergetic efficiency after TFA but did find a   Physical Fitness
          reduction in walking speed. Only when age was taken     Raya et al., in a high quality article, reported
          into account in a multiple regression model did the   hip strength and balance were significant fac-
          impact of the level of amputation become statistically   tors impacting 6MWT scores in individuals with
          significant (24). Hamamura et al. reported, in a high   LLA. The 6MWT can identify impairments of the
          quality study, no significant difference between the   musculoskeletal system that can affect ambulation
          successful and unsuccessful ambulator groups when   ability such as weakness in the muscles that support
          considering amputation level (17). Guanard et al., in a   ambulation (32). Chin et al. reported that when older
          high quality article, reported on the importance of an   HDA patients are in good physical condition, they
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62