Page 56 - REV T-I JOURNAL INTERIOR ISSUU 18 2-3
P. 56

132                                  KAHLE ET AL.



      Predictive Factors Supported with Three to Five   Pre-Amputation Living Status
      References in This Literature Review            Several reports in this literature review collected

      Ability to Stand on One Leg                   data on factors related to living status, such as marital
        In a medium quality study, Grameaux et al. iden-  status and independence. However, none of them
                                                    reported correlations on living status being a predic-
      tified the one-leg balance test as appropriate for early   tive characteristic of walking ability following lower
      evaluation in the immediate follow-up of the ampu-  extremity amputation (18,21,22,26).
      tation in order to establish a prognosis for success
      in prosthetic ambulation (24). Hamamura et al., in   Cause of Amputation

      a high quality study, identified the patient’s ability to     Some authors reported cause of amputation as a
      stand on one leg on the non-amputated limb as one   factor in prosthetic candidacy; however, there was
      of the most valuable factors contributing to successful   no association of cause as a predictive characteristic
      prosthetic ambulation in geriatric amputees, report-  of walking candidacy (11,21,27). Hamamura et al.
      ing significance in successful prosthetic walkers (17).   reported on cause of amputation, yet no significant
      van Eijk et al., in a medium quality article, reported   difference between the two groups (successful and
      that one-leg balance was significantly positively asso-  unsuccessful ambulators) was observed (17). Wezen-
      ciated with prosthetic use (20). These reports are   berg et al. found that the presence of an amputation
      consistent with previous reports identifying the ability   as a result of vascular deficiency was significantly
      to stand on one leg as indicative of better walking   associated with a lower VO2 peak of 29.1%, whereas a
      potential after unilateral lower limb amputation (5).  traumatic amputation was not significantly associated
      Cognition and Mood Disturbance                with a difference in VO2 peak compared with controls.
        Webster et al. reported, in a study of high quality,   Having a vascular amputation was associated with a
                                                    26.4% decrease in VO2 peak compared with having an
      that management of depression and promotion of   amputation because of trauma (28). In a second later
      social support may have a positive effect on pros-  article, Wezenberg et al. found traumatic amputees
      thetic use (18). O’Neill et al., in a report of medium   walked at the same VO2 as able-bodied controls but
      quality, concluded that identified cognitive deficits   did so at a lower walking speed. Vascular amputees
      may indicate augmented rehabilitation or provision   walked at an even slower speed with a substantially
      of alternative mobility rehabilitation (25). Stineman   higher VO2. Both amputee groups chose a walking
      et al. reported ADL function and mobility (physi-  speed that was lower than the most efficient walking
      cal functioning) using gains in motor FIM™ scores   speed. Consideration of peak aerobic capacity is an
      achieved by rehabilitation discharge. Psychosis was   important factor when aiming to improve walking
      associated with lower motor FIM™ gains, but no direct   ability in amputees (14). Finally, peak aerobic capac-
      correlation between psychosis and prosthetic candi-  ity is an important determinant for walking ability.
      dacy was reported (21). In the previous Sansam et al.
      article, cognitive ability was consistently found to be   Sansam et al. also reported an association between
      a significant predictor of walking ability following   the cause of amputation and walking potential in five
                                                    studies, with subjects undergoing an amputation for
      rehabilitation, with a superior outcome reported in   dysvascularity achieving a poorer outcome than those
      those with better cognitive ability (5).
                                                    due to trauma or other non-vascular causes (5).
      Gender
        Four high quality studies found no association   Predictive Factors Previously Reported Supported
      between gender and walking ability following lower   With Six or More References in This Literature
      limb amputation, suggesting it is not a predictive   Review
      determinant (19-22). Previous studies also found no   Amputation Level
      consistent association with gender (5).
                                                      Artwert et al., in a high quality article, reported
                                                    that functional use of a prosthesis in TTA patients
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61