Page 31 - T-I JOURNAL19-3

LA-STEM PROGRAM: STEM SUCCESS MODEL 591

Educ. 2014;91(11):1762-1776. difference for minorities: evaluation of an edu-
28. Braxton JM, Hirschy AS, McClendon SA. Under- cational enrichment program. J Res Sci Teach.
standing and reducing college student departure. 2004;41(9):861-881.
San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2004. ASHE- 42. Hathaway RS, Nagda BA, Gregerman SR. The
ERIC Higher Education Report: Volume 30, relationship of undergraduate research partic-
Number 3. ipation to graduate and professional education
29. Metzner BS. Perceived quality of academic advis- pursuit: an empirical study. J Coll Stud Dev.
ing: the effect on freshman attrition. Am Educ 2002;43(5):614.
Res J. 1989;26(3):422-442. 43. Gregerman SR, Lerner JS, von Hippel W, Jon-
30. Seidman A. College student retention: formula ides J, Nagda BA. Undergraduate student-faculty
for student success. Westport (CT): Praeger Pub- research partnerships affect student retention.
lishers; 2005. Rev High Educ. 1998;22(1):55-72.
31. Seymour E, Hewitt NM. Talking about leaving: 44. Walters NB. Retaining aspiring scholars:
Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder recruitment and retention of students of color
(CO): Westview Press; 1997. in graduate and professional science degree
32. Tinto V. Leaving college: rethinking the causes programs. Ashe annual meeting paper. Paper
and cures of student attrition. Chicago (IL): Uni- presented at Annual Meeting of the Association
versity of Chicago Press; 1993. for the Study of Higher Education; 1997 Nov 6-9,
33. Tinto V. Completing college: rethinking insti- Albuquerque, NM.
tutional action. Chicago (IL): University of 45. Astin AW, Astin HS. Undergraduate science
Chicago Press; 2012. education: the impact of different college envi-
34. Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: ronments on the educational pipeline in the
an overview. Theor Pract. 2002;41(4):212-218. sciences. Final report. Los Angeles (CA): Higher
35. Whalen S, editor. 2015-16 CSRDE STEM Education Research Institute; 1992.
retention report. Norman (OK): Center for 46. Tinto V. Leaving college: rethinking the causes
Institutional Data Exchange and Analysis; 2016. and cures of student attrition. Chicago (IL):
36. Grandy J. Persistence in science of high-ability ERIC; 1987.
minority students: results of a longitudinal study. 47. Thiry H, Laursen SL, Hunter A-B. What expe-
J High Educ. 1998;69(6):589-620. riences help students become scientists? A
38. Ackermann SP. The benefits of summer bridge comparative study of research and other sources
programs for underrepresented and low-in- of personal and professional gains for stem under-
come students. Community Coll J Res Pract. graduates. J Higher Educ. 2011;82(4):357-388.
1990;15(2):211-224. 48. Russell SH, Hancock MP, McCullough J. Benefits
38. Person DR, Christensen MC. Understanding of undergraduate research experiences. Science.
black student culture and black student reten- 2007;316(5824):548-549.
tion. NASPA J. 1996;34(1):47-56. 49. Russell SH, Hancock MP, McCullough J, Roess-
39. Best A. Bridge for all: higher education design ner JD, Storey C, GS NC. Evaluation of NSF
principles to broaden participation in science, support for undergraduate research opportuni-
technology, engineering and mathematics. San ties: survey of STEM graduates: draft final report.
Diego (CA): BEST-Building Engineering and Menlo Park (CA): SRI International; 2005.
Science Talent; 2004. 50. Seymour E, Hunter AB, Laursen SL, DeAntoni
40. Maton KI, Hrabowski FA, Schmitt CL. African T. Establishing the benefits of research experi-
American college students excelling in the sci- ences for undergraduates in the sciences: first
ences: college and postcollege outcomes in the findings from a three‐year study. Sci Educ.
Meyerhoff Scholars Program. J Res Sci Teach. 2004;88(4):493-534.
2000;37(7):629-654. 51. Hunter AB, Laursen SL, Seymour E. Becoming
41. Barlow AE, Villarejo M. Making a a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in