Page 107 - Technology and Innovation Journal - 19-1
P. 107

THE NAI PROFILE                              445



             I think one of the key features for success in both  expecting a return on those investments to improve
             is that people need to be inspired and they need to  their lot or the lot of their kids. I think one needs to
             know why. There needs to be purpose. This is a pur-  be pursuing a strong balance of long-term research
             pose-led organization: reinventing the way people  along with seeing how that research can benefit and
             make things, design things, engineer things, and  improve the health and well-being of society.
             deliver things. A lot of it is directed to health care,  T&I: Turning from the general to the more personal,
             lowering health care costs and changing the way  I’d like to dig in a little on your own story. You are a
             people treat and cure diseases, making cars more  serial entrepreneur, and it’s one thing to be an entre-
             fuel-efficient and safer—really, all sorts of purposes  preneur and another thing altogether to be a serial
             are embedded in what we do. Universities are similar.  entrepreneur. Statistically, only one in ten adults
             I think the strong connection between the two is that  engages in entrepreneurial activities in the U.S. and
             they are purpose-led organizations.        an even narrower subset (29% of the original one in
               I’m a big believer in research, especially academic  ten) can be classified as serial entrepreneurs. What
             research and how it can create new things that are  do you identify as the reason for your involvement
             better and can improve the health and well-being  in what is really such a rare activity?
             of society. This becomes a call to action. I think too
             many times academic research can lie dormant and   DeSimone: I think it’s addicting. Once you start
             never get outside the academy. There is a moral obli-  doing it, the challenge is that the highs can be really,
             gation to do that. If one of my colleagues invents a   really high and the lows can be really, really low. To
             cure for AIDS or Ebola and if she publishes a paper   try to do it with an even keel is important. I can tell
             before her university even files a patent, the $600   you that, with one of my earlier endeavors before
             million of needed follow-on investment may never   Carbon, when I was watching remotely when our
             happen in order to convert that brilliant concept into   first biodegradable stent was being implanted in a
             a legitimate product. It is vital to foster openness, but   human in New Zealand, my knees were weak and
             that doesn’t mean it isn’t also vital for universities   I had goosebumps. It was unbelievable. Now, there
             to protect inventions with patents. That is neces-  are over 200,000 people around the world who have
             sary if breakthrough research is going to have the   our stents.
             significant societal impact that it can have. The abil-    When I go to the Midwest and talk to Chip Gear,
             ity for academic research to lead to transformative   who is a retired Navy Captain with a business that
             products depends on financing from commercial   is changing the footprint in the Rust Belt of the U.S.
             interests—financing that is not achievable without   and creating jobs and businesses and driving inno-
             a strong patent.                           vation, it’s pretty heartwarming and inspiring. It’s
               I love the marketplace. The marketplace in a   heady stuff going into some of these humble places
             controlled way really elevates society. If you publish  and seeing that people are so damned fired up that a
             something, and it’s open, and it’s not patented first,  tech group out in this Silicon Valley is helping them
             commercial interests now lack incentive to invest  change their businesses. That’s pretty heady. When
             significant money to develop a product and enable  they start talking about visions that are as big as your
             that research to achieve its true impact and improve  own vision and based on your technology, it is goose-
             people’s lives. It wouldn’t be uncommon to need to  bumps time. That’s truly motivating for a science
             plow one billion dollars into a new drug to go through  person, a polymer person; that’s pretty neat.
             all the appropriate FDA approval studies on efficacy    And it is addicting to see that your toolbox can
             and safety. If that money doesn’t get invested, the  be helpful to others. When I started doing medi-
             product will never see the light of day. I think there’s  cal-related research that involved NIH funding, it
             a need—I think there’s a moral obligation—to patent  was a powerful experience. NIH often has patient
             breakthroughs in academic research. There are a lot  advocates who go on peer review site visits, you know,
             of people who are waking up at 3:30 in the morning  cancer survivors who are scientists and engineers
             to go to work and making minimum wage and paying  standing by a student’s poster trying to understand
             taxes that go to the National Science Foundation and  their approach for treating pancreatic cancer. Are you
             the National Institutes of Health (NIH). People are  kidding? Talk about a high. That is so motivating,
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112