Page 85 - Technology and Innovation Journal - 19-1
P. 85

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH COMMERCIALIZATION                      423



             6.  Pielke R Jr. In retrospect: science the endless   PDF-WEB-Platform-Survey_01_12.pdf
                frontier. Nature. 466:922–923; 2010.    13.  Rochet JC, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-
             7.  Love BJ. Do university patents pay off? evidence   sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc. 1(4):990-1029;
                from a survey of university inventors in com-  2003.
                puter science and electrical engineering. Yale J  14.  Wikipedia contributors. The CRL is inspired
                L & Tech. 16:285; 2014.                    by Defense Department’s & NASA’s Technol-
             8.  Bessemer Venture Partners. The anti-portfolio.   ogy Readiness Level. Wikipedia, The Free
                Boston (MA): Bessemer Venture Partners; c2017   Encyclopedia; 2017 May 10 [2017 May 15].
                [accessed 2017 May 15]. https://www.bvp.com/  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_
                portfolio/anti-portfolio.                  readiness_level. While there are other similar
             9.  Munari F, Toschi L. Are academic spinoffs   readiness level scales such as https://steveblank.
                able to attract VC financing? Evidence     com/2013/11/25/its-time-to-play-moneyball-
                from the micro and nanotechnology sector in the   the-investment-readiness-level/, the CRL was
                UK. Paper presented at: Copenhagen Business   formulated to best capture the stage and evolu-
                School Summer Conference. 2009 Jun 17-19;   tion of university technologies until they leave
                Copenhagen, Denmark.                       the university as licensed IP (i.e., it captures both
             10.  Stokes D. Pasteur’s quadrant. Washington (DC):   technology readiness and market readiness, as
                Brookings Institute; 1997. p. 73.          well the (unique) relevance to each university).
             11.  Shapiro C, Varian HR. Information rules: a stra-  15.  MATTO joint invention administration
                tegic guide to the network economy. Brighton   agreement format [template]. Boston (MA):
                (MA): Harvard Business Review Press; 1999.  Massachusetts Association of Technology
             12.  Evans PC, Gawer A. The rise of the platform   Transfer Offices; 2007. [accessed 2017 May 15].
                enterprise. New York (NY): The Center for Global   http://www.masstechtransfer.org/files/2008/01/
                Enterprise; 2016. [accessed 2017 May 15]. http://  matto_jiaa_final.doc.
                www.thecge.net/wp-content/ uploads/ 2016/01/
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90