Page 136 - leadership-experience-2008
P. 136

CikguOnline
         CikguOnline
               CHAPTER 4: THE LEADER AS AN INDIVIDUAL                                                    117













                                         Text not available due to copyright restrictions
















               typical CEO has at least two, usually three, and often four strong preferences and
               thus has a wide range of thinking options available to choose from. A
               broad range of thinking styles is particularly important at higher
               levels of organizations because leaders deal with a greater variety   Action Memo
               and complexity of people and issues. 35                       As a leader, you can strive for “whole
                   Understanding that individuals have different thinking styles   brain” thinking to deal effectively with a
                                                                               You can be aware of your natural thinking
               can also help leaders be more effective in interacting with follow-  wide variety of people and complex issues.
               ers. Some leaders act as if everyone responds to the same material   patterns and include other perspectives that
               and behavior in the same way, but this isn’t true. Some people prefer   help you develop a broader understanding.

               facts and figures, whereas others want to know about relationships
               and patterns. Some followers prefer freedom and fl exibility, whereas
               others crave structure and order. At Nissan Design International, Jerry
                 Hirshberg used an understanding of cognitive differences to change
               how he leads.

                 IN THE LEAD  Jerry Hirshberg, Nissan Design International
                   Jerry Hirshberg is a predominantly D-quadrant leader. He likes thinking broadly and
                   dreaming big, deriving ideas intuitively—and he abhors tight structure and control.
                   He once assumed that his employees would as well. Hirshberg wanted his design-
                   ers to have the freedom to be creative, to take risks, and to innovate. Therefore,
                   he was surprised when he learned that a few of his followers actually wanted and
                   needed more structure in order to perform at their best.
                      Hirshberg assumed his employees would react to information and ideas the
                   same way he did. He would throw huge amounts of information at them and expect
                   them to respond intuitively and creatively. Some people, however, always hesitated,
                   which Hirschberg originally interpreted as a resistance to innovation and change.
                   However, over time, he came to realize that some of his designers simply wanted
                   and needed time to “process” the information and to develop more logical, analyti-
                   cal approaches to Hirschberg’s intuitively derived ideas. When they were given this

                   time, the employees returned with significant contributions and excellent plans that
                   moved the project forward.
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141