Page 139 - Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Caring
P. 139

F r o m ca ra t i v e  F a c t o r  6  t o   C a r it a s   P roC e s s 6
           a health profession” fit in a culture currently dominated by evidence-
           based medical thinking?
              Reminding  us  of  different  forms  of  evidence,  Martinsen  refer-
           ences Finnish nursing scholar Katie Eriksson (1999). Together, they
           point out that “linguistically, the meaning of evidence is to see and to
           gain insight into; the word ‘evidence’ is related to ‘knowing,’ which
           again may mean to attend to, to become familiar with, to experience,
           and based on this, [to] reach an indisputable certainty regarding some
           issue” (Martinsen 2006:123). Thus, evidence has strong ties to the obvi-
           ous, the palpable, the incontestable, the distinct and clear, as well as to
           the proof of natural events.
              Therefore, such expanded and deepened notions of evidence and
           seeing relate to theory in the Latin/Greek word sense, in that the word
           theoria can be translated as “to see.” When these notions are linked,
           we focus on gaining insight into, attending to, knowing, experiencing,
           judging: using all ways of knowing. Thus, these notions give a much
           wider and deeper meaning to “adequacy of evidence,” beyond simply
           proving or measuring or validating an empirical fact.
              In this more expanded and broader view of evidence, we can seek
           to distinguish between complete (adequate) evidence and incomplete
           (inadequate) evidence (Martinsen 2006:124). Further, in clarifying this
           line of thinking, we can begin to unravel certain forms of evidence,
           such as subject matter, some experiences, situations, phenomena, and
           even pre-scientific, pre-conscious notions, as well as objective external
           givens, facts, and so forth. Each form of evidence may yield differ-
           ent forms of knowledge pertaining to certain situations and objects of
           analysis: inner or outer phenomena. One form of evidence may not
           conform to another form of evidence needed for adequate decision
           making; congruence between different forms of evidence is necessary
           to understand human experiences in this living human-environmental
           field of complexities, ambiguities, and unknowns.
              While it is critical to have evidence and scientific-technical, empiri-
           cal knowledge for professional practice, the phenomenon of nursing evi-
           dence has to be expanded and deepened in the fullest sense of the word
           for professional care to occur; thus, the notion and process of evidence
           need to be critiqued, discussed, and unraveled for the best practice.


                                                                   111
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144