Page 140 - Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Caring
P. 140

Fr om  carative Fa c t o r  6  t o   C ar it as ProC e s s  6
               In reality, neither the nurse nor the physician can take a single
           piece of “evidence,” a single research finding, a single theoretical or
           empirical fact, and translate any or all of it into a single, simplistic,
           systematic, scientific, evidentiary, linear problem-solving process in a
           given patient care situation. It is not possible to do so. Human beings
           are too complex for such a linear response to evidence to be effective.
               In addition, it is important to remind ourselves once again that
           “evidence” takes many forms and that there is a difference between
           data and information, knowledge, understanding, and wisdom. That
           is, a loose datum is not coherent information; information is not the
           same as knowledge; and knowledge alone without reflection, process-
           ing, and integration into specific and complex situations is not wis-
           dom. So, having information related to evidence per se, without trans-
           lating that information into knowledge associated with the complexity
           of human life and the current world situation, is not necessarily useful.
           A wise Caritas practitioner seeks to integrate necessary “evidence” at
           multiple levels with the wise clinical judgment necessary for address-
           ing individual people with individual life stories and circumstances:
           integrating practitioner and person-patient-family.

                     asking new Questions aBout “evidenCe”
           Nursing is at a dramatic turning point at this point in the twenty-first
           century. If nursing is to evolve and mature as a discipline and a distinct
           caring profession, it is appropriate to critique and raise new questions
           and to explore a variety of discourses about what counts as evidence.
           Thus, there are different ways of validating or testing situations with
           regard to what counts as evidence.
              Does one’s clinical judgment count as evidence? Does the nurse’s
           dissonance between affective and cognitive impressions and among
           rational, quasi-rational, affective impressions count as evidence? (See
           Chapter 9.)
              Does  Nursing  Theory  count  as  evidence?  Do  personal  percep-
           tions,  knowledge,  values,  ethics,  intuition,  and  perceptions  count?
           These questions need to be raised in the field of Caring Science if
           nursing is to avoid jumping on a restrictive linear process in consider-
           ing a knee-jerk approach to evidence—an approach that is linear, lim-


           112
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145