Page 136 - Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Caring
P. 136

Fr om  carative Fa c t o r  6  t o   C ar it as ProC e s s  6
               However,  while  nursing  scholarship  within  a  Caritas  Model  has
           matured, Janice Muff’s earlier (1988) critique of nursing from an out-
           side lens unfortunately still lingers in educational and practice mind-
           sets; that is, authoritarianism has a strong tradition throughout nurs-
           ing education and practice cultures. Her research found that nursing
           instructors often believe and teach “that there is only one right way to
           do things—their way.” As she viewed it, nursing creates self-imposed
           restrictions on itself. For example, despite nursing faculty’s rhetoric
           of developing autonomous professionals, agents of change, leaders,
           and so on, nursing students are often rewarded more for obedience
           and conformity than for assertiveness, questioning, and differences of
           opinion (Watson 1999).
              The often arbitrary, linear “nursing process” to which nurses have
           historically subscribed as a formal procedure is too often presented as
           a truism and the only way to problem solve, when in reality it does
           not work that way. In fact, the nursing process is merely a common
           problem-solving process that has been renamed and relabeled “nursing
           process.” These identity and boundary structures create false bound-
           aries and a false impression that nursing has some special approach to
           problem solving (Muff 1988).
              Nurses have a history of working from set roles and functions,
           of fixed ways of being and doing, without those methods necessarily
           being scientific or scholarly. In spite of advanced education, scholarly
           practices, and role changes, today, in its own way, a robotic tendency
           has emerged in the fast-paced institutional system, reinforcing the old
           tendency to adhere to rigid technical mind-sets and medical-techno-
           cure institutional demands. This habitual institutional mind-set hap-
           pens without awareness, without pausing to critique, without bring-
           ing one’s full consciousness and intentionality to bear on the use of
           the available expanded knowledge, values, and human dynamics nec-
           essary for a reflective practice model that embraces the best of both
           science and art.
              A glimpse into conventional nursing and nurse detachment in an
           effort to be “professional” and in some instances “scientific,” which is
           separate from a caring-healing relationship, is captured in Sylvia Plath’s
           classic poem “Tulips,” which was written after she was hospitalized.


           108
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141