Page 277 - Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Caring
P. 277

C ar it as  cu rr icu lu m  a n d   t ea c h i n g-l ea r n i n g
           ing. She is arguably an exemplar of living the paradox of oneness with
           her being, knowing, doing in the world. This is not to say that we
           must agree with everything she said and did, but it is worth remem-
           bering that her weltanschauung (worldview) was largely what moti-
           vated her actions as one of the key figures in the emergence of mod-
           ern nursing.

             the analytic and experiMental as Mythic episteMology
           Just as objectivism is a mythology yet can destructively become our
           ethic, ethos, and mind-set for teaching, learning, scholarship, and so
           on, Parker Palmer pointed out the same misstep with the notion that
           “analytic” and “experimental” mean “Being scientific.” Analytic, as he
           makes explicit, means that once you have objectified a phenomenon as
           something to be studied, you are then free to cut it into little pieces to
           see how it works; to break it down into parts, hold it at a distance, ana-
           lyze it, and thus understand it. Palmer used this cutting-things-up phe-
           nomenon in order to look at, to understand, something “objectively,”
           as a metaphor for what education often does to the human mind and
           human heart and human soul—the human experience in its totality.
           Palmer argues that this great facility for taking things apart, dissect-
           ing them to the point that one cannot know the original, is a form of
           violence in that it cultivates a lack of sensitivity and little capacity for
           putting things back together, including the human heart.
              The  same  is  true  for  the  myth  of  “experimental,”  in  that  the
           mythology of objectivity, analytic, sets up mythological imprints that
           suggest that once things are objectified, dissected into parts, we are
           free to experiment. This focus in turn leads us to justify reducing a
           human to the moral status of object so we can objectively know, study,
           experiment, and conduct science.
              This form of experimentation with humans and nature leads us to
           seek designs with what we think the world should be like, to control
           and dominate the outcome, so to speak, with our logic, our distant
           data, and our moving things around from their original form. We do
           this without paying attention to potentially destructive outcomes for
           self, society, humanity, the environment, and nature alike. This thesis
           of Palmer’s about the epistemological myths that deform our ethics


                                                                   249
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282