Page 196 - Essentials of Nursing Leadership and Management, 5th Edition
P. 196

CikguOnline
         2208_Ch12_169-196.qxd  11/6/09  6:01 PM  Page 183
                                                                    chapter 12 | Promoting a Healthy Workplace 183         CikguOnline
                 personnel were well aware of issues related to latex  included in the review of safer devices as well as in
                 allergies. In recent years, the number of new cases of  making recommendations for replacement devices.
                 latex allergy has decreased due to improved diag-  (osha.gov/needlesticks/needlefaq;http://www.joint
                 nostic methods, improved education, and more  commission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEvent
                 accurate labeling of medical devices. Although cur-  Alert/sea_22.htm)
                 rent research does not demonstrate whether the
                 amount of allergen released during shipping and  Your Employer’s Responsibility
                 storage into medications from vials with rubber clo-  According to the current OSHA requirements,
                 sures is sufficient to induce a systemic allergic reac-  your employer must provide you with the following
                 tion, nurses should take special precautions when  (ANA, 1993; nursingworld.org/dlwa/osh/wp2):
                 patients are identified as high risk for latex allergies.
                                                             ■ Free hepatitis B vaccine
                 The nursing staff should work closely with the
                                                             ■ Protective equipment that fits you (gloves,
                 pharmacy staff to follow universal one-stick-rule
                                                              gowns, goggles, masks)
                 precautions, which assume that every pharmaceuti-
                                                             ■ Immediate, confidential medical evaluation,
                 cal vial may contain a natural rubber latex closure,
                                                              treatment, and follow-up if you are exposed
                 and the nurse should remain with any patient at the
                                                             ■ Implementation of universal precautions
                 start of medication and keep frequent observations
                                                              institution-wide
                 and vital signs for 2 hours (Hamilton et al., 2005).
                                                             ■ Adequate sharps disposal
                                                             ■ Proper removal of hazards from the workplace
                 Needlestick Injuries                        ■ Annual employee training
                 In 1997 a 27-year-old nurse, Lisa Black, attended  Many states have enacted their own laws related to
                 an in-service session on postexposure prophylaxis  blood-borne pathogen exposures. These laws may
                 for needlesticks. A short time later, she was  include some of the following requirements:
                 attempting to aspirate blood from a patient’s intra-  ■ Listing of safety devices as engineering controls
                 venous line. The patient, in the advanced stages of  ■ Development of a list of available safety devices
                 acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, moved, and  by the state for use by employers
                 the needle went into Lisa’s hand.Nine months later  ■ Development of a written exposure plan by
                 she tested positive for HIV and 3 months after that  employers and periodic review and updates
                 for hepatitis C. She continues to share her story  ■ Development of protocols for safety device
                 with nurses everywhere in an effort to prevent this  identification and selection by employers
                 unfortunate accident from happening to one more  and involvement by frontline workers in the
                 nurse (Trossman, 1999a).                      process
                   On April 18, 2001, the Needlestick Act, or  ■ Development of a sharps injury log and report-
                 revised Bloodborne Pathogens Standard, went  ing log information
                 into effect. The revised OSHA Bloodborne    ■ Development of methods to increase use of vac-
                 Pathogens Standard obligates employers to con-  cines and personal protective equipment
                 sider safer needle devices when they conduct their  ■ Waivers or exemptions from safety device use
                 annual review of their exposure control plan.  under certain circumstances (including patient
                 Frontline employees must be included in the  and/or worker safety issues, use of alternative effec-
                 annual review and updating of standards process.  tive strategies, market unavailability, and so on)
                 Stricter requirements are now in effect for annual  ■ Placement of sharps containers in accessible
                 review and updating to reflect changes in technol-  positions
                 ogy that eliminate or reduce exposure to blood-  ■ Training for workers regarding safety device
                 borne pathogens. JC surveyors are now asking if  use (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/bbp/
                 health-care organization leaders are familiar with  ndl-law.htm)
                 the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act and
                 whether any action being taken to comply    Your Responsibility
                 includes staff that use sharps and needles and are  What are your responsibilities related to this revised
                 therefore at risk for injury. The law requires   legislation? Each year your institution must review
                 that  these health-care workers and other staff be  and update its blood-borne pathogen standards.You
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201