Page 196 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 196

CHAPTER 11  Katie Eriksson  177

           movement  between  logical  and  empirical  evidence,   The theses are as follows:
           has been summarized by Eriksson in her model of    •  Ethos  confers  ultimate  meaning  on  the  caring
           concept development (Eriksson, 1997b). The validity   context.
           of this model has been tested in several doctoral dis-  •  The basic motive of caring is the caritas motive.
           sertations  since  1995  (Gustafsson,  2008;  Hilli,  2007;   •  The basic category of caring is suffering.
           Kasén, 2002; Lassenius, 2005; Lindwall, 2004; Nåden,   •  Caring communion forms the context of meaning
           1998; Näsman, 2010; Rundqvist, 2004; Sivonen, 2000;   of caring and derives its origin from the ethos of
           Wallinvirta, 2011; von Post, 1999). She started more   love, responsibility, and sacrifice, namely, caritative
           comprehensive systematic as well as clinical research   ethics.
           programs on caring when she was appointed director   •  Health means a movement in becoming, being, and
           of the Department of Caring Science at Åbo Akademi   doing  while  striving  for  wholeness  and  holiness,
           University. All 44 doctoral dissertations written at the   which is compatible with endurable suffering.
           Department of Caring Science between 1992 and 2012   •  Caring implies alleviation of suffering in charity,
           are in different ways a test and validation of her ideas   love, faith, and hope. Natural basic caring is ex-
           and theory.                                     pressed through tending, playing, and learning in a
                                                           sustained caring relationship, which is asymmetrical
                                                           by nature.
            Major Assumptions
           Eriksson  distinguishes  between  two  kinds  of  major   The Human Being
           assumptions: axioms and theses. She regards axioms   The  conception  of  the  human  being  in  Eriksson’s
           as fundamental truths in relation to the conception of   theory is based on the axiom that the human being
           the  world;  theses  are  fundamental  statements  con-  is an entity of body, soul, and spirit (Eriksson, 1987a,
           cerning the general nature of caring science, and their   1988). She emphasizes that the human being is funda-
           validity is tested through basic research. Axioms and   mentally a religious being, but all human beings have
           theses jointly constitute the ontology of caring science   not  recognized  this  dimension.  The  human  being
           and therefore also are the foundation of its epistemol-  is  fundamentally  holy,  and  this  axiom  is  related  to
           ogy (Eriksson, 1988, 2001). The caritative theory of   the  idea  of  human  dignity,  which  means  accepting
           caring is based on the following axioms and theses, as   the human obligation of serving with love and exist-
           modified and clarified from Eriksson’s basic assump-  ing for the sake of others. Eriksson stresses the necessity
           tions with her approval (Eriksson, 2002). The axioms   of understanding the human being in his ontological
           are as follows:                               context.  The  human  being  is  seen  as  in  constant
           •  The  human  being  is  fundamentally  an  entity  of   becoming;  he  is  constantly  in  change  and  therefore
             body, soul, and spirit.                     never in a state of full completion. He is understood
           •  The human being is fundamentally a religious being.  in terms of the dual tendencies that exist within him,
           •  The human being is fundamentally holy. Human   engaged in a continued struggle and living in a ten-
             dignity means accepting the human obligation of   sion  between  being  and  nonbeing.  Eriksson  sees
             serving with love, of existing for the sake of others.  the human being’s conditional freedom as a dimen-
           •  Communion is the basis for all humanity. Human   sion  of  becoming.  She  links  her  thinking  with
             beings are fundamentally interrelated to an abstract   Kierkegaard’s  (1843/1943)  ideas  of  free  choice  and
             and/or concrete other in a communion.       decision in the human being’s various stages—aesthetic,
           •  Caring  is  something  human  by  nature,  a  call  to   ethical,  and  religious  stages—and  she  thinks  that  the
             serve in love.                              human being’s power of transcendency is the founda-
           •  Suffering  is  an  inseparable  part  of  life.  Suffering   tion of real freedom. The dual tendency of the human
             and health are each other’s prerequisites.  being also emerges in his effort to be unique, while
           •  Health is more than the absence of illness. Health   he  simultaneously  longs  for  belonging  in  a  larger
             implies wholeness and holiness.             communion.
           •  The human being lives in a reality that is character-  The  human  being  is  fundamentally  dependent  on
             ized by mystery, infinity, and eternity.    communion; he is dependent on another, and it is in the
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201