Page 408 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 408
CHAPTER 20 Afaf Ibrahim Meleis 389
CRITICAL THINKING ACTIVITIES
1. Consider a transition you are personally engaged you are experiencing. List influences such as cul-
in now. Identify characteristics of the transition tural beliefs and attitudes, socioeconomic status,
as defined in Transitions Theory that you have and level of your preparation that impact your
observed. Does consideration of this specific tran- approach to the transition.
sition make you more aware of other transitions 4. Review your responses to the transition, and look
you are experiencing? for patterns in the responses. Ask five friends or
2. Analyze the changes that you are experiencing due family members of different ages or ethnicity to
to the specific transition. Consider how your level describe their responses to the transition. Com-
of awareness of these changes influences your pare the descriptions given by those individuals
transition experience. Think about how long the with yours.
transition has been and what have been the land- 5. Consider the outcomes of the personal transition
mark events and critical points of the transition. in question 1. What would facilitate successful
3. Analyze personal, community, and societal condi- outcomes to the transition? What might inhibit
tions that may have influenced the transition that successful outcomes?
POINTS FOR FURTHER STUDY
n Meleis, A. I. (2011). Theoretical Nursing: Development the University of Pennsylvania at:http://www.
and Progress (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott. nursing.upenn.edu/dean/transitions/
n To respond to researchers’ increasing interest in
Transitions Theory, a website was established at
REFERENCES
Aroian, K., & Prater, M., (1988). Transitions entry groups: rehabilitation: effect on patient compliance. Patient
easing new patients’ adjustment to psychiatric hospi- Education and Counseling, 6(4), 169–177.
talization. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39, Gaffney, K. F. (1992). Nurse practice-model for maternal
312–313. role sufficiency. Advances in Nursing Sciences, 15(2),
Brackley, M. H. (1992). A role supplementation group 76–84.
pilot study: a nursing therapy for potential parental Im, E. O. (1997). Negligence and ignorance of menopause
caregivers. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 6(1), 14–19. within gender multiple transition context: Low income
Bridges, W. (1980). Transitions. Reading, (MA): Addison- Korean immigrant women. Unpublished doctoral dis-
Wesley. sertation, University of California, San Francisco.
Bridges, W. (1991). Managing transition: Making the most Im, E. O. (2005). Development of situation-specific theories:
of change. Menlo Park, (CA): Addison Wesley. An integrative approach. Advances in Nursing Science,
Chick, N., & Meleis, A. I. (1986). Transitions: a nursing 28(2), 137–151.
concern. In: Chin P. L. (Ed.), Nursing Research Method- Im, E. O. (2006). A situation-specific theory of Caucasian
ology: Issues and Implantation. Gainsburg, MD: Aspen. cancer patients’ pain experience. Advances in Nursing
Davies, S. (2005). Meleis’s theory of nursing transitions Science, 29(3), 232–244.
and relatives’ experiences of nursing home entry. Im, E. O. (2010). A situation-specific theory of Asian
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(6), 658–671. immigrant women’s menopausal symptom experience
Dracup, K., & Meleis, A. I. (1982). Compliance: an interac- in the United States. Advances in Nursing Science,
tionist approach. Nursing Research, 31, 31–36. 33(2), 143–157.
Dracup, K., Meleis, A. T., Baker, K., & Edlefsen, P. (1985). Im, E. O. (2011). Transitions theory: A trajectory of theo-
Family-focused cardiac rehabilitation: a role supple- retical development in nursing. Nursing Outlook, 59(5),
mentation program for cardiac patients and spouses. 278–285.
Nursing Clinics of North America, 19(1), 113–124. Im, E. O., & Meleis, A. I. (1999a). Situation-specific theories:
Dracup, K., Meleis, A. I., Clark, S., Clyburn, A., Shields, Philosophical roots, properties, and approach. Advances
L., & Staley, M. (1985). Group counseling in cardiac in Nursing Science, 22(2), 11–24.

