Page 544 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 544

CHAPTER 26  Gladys L. Husted and James H. Husted  525

           represents an integration of the agent’s awareness of the   This understanding makes negotiation and cooperation
           facts  of  the  situation  and  her  preexisting  knowledge   among individuals possible.
           about  how  to  most  effectively  deal  with  these  facts
           (Husted & Husted, 2008).                      Ethical Standards
                                                         Ethical standards have been the benchmarks of ethical
                                                         behavior. The standards include terms familiar to health
            Theoretical Assertions                       care  professionals  such  as  beneficence,  veracity,  and
           Symphonology is classified as a grand theory because   confidentiality.  However,  the  authors  have  conceived
           of  its  broad  scope.  Grand  theories  structure  goals    new meanings for ethical standards that correspond to
           related to a specific view of the discipline (Walker &   the foundational concepts of Symphonology: the per-
           Avant, 2011). Grand theories are broader than con-  son as a unique individual, and the use of insight and
           ceptual models and may be used as a model to guide   discernment  in  addition  to  reason  and  rationality  in
           practice and research (Fawcett & Garity, 2009). The   order to achieve a deeper understanding.
           authors  developed  Symphonology  Theory  not  from   Traditionally, bioethical concepts have been used to
           natural progression of other work, but from the rec-  guide ethical action by mandating concrete directives
           ognition of a need for theoretical guidelines related to   for  action.  For  instance,  the  concept  of  beneficence
           the ethical delivery of health care. The understanding   conventionally  maintains  that  one  must  see  that  no
           and  use  of  this  theory  are  based  on  a  fundamental   harm comes to a patient. However, it is not always pos-
           ethical  element  that  describes  the  rational  relation-  sible to predict how and when harm will occur, mak-
           ship between human beings: human rights.      ing adherence to this directive an unrealistic goal. The
                                                         concept  of  beneficence,  viewed  as  a  mandate,  could
           Rights                                        also imply that defending yourself against a physical
           The Husteds describe rights as the fundamental ethical   attack is unethical. Similarly, veracity, or truth telling,
           element.  Traditionally,  rights  are  viewed  as  a  list  of    holds that one must always speak the truth regardless
           options to which one is entitled, such as a list of items    of the consequences. Therefore, it is unethical to with-
           or actions to which one has a just claim. Symphonology   hold  potentially  harmful  information,  regardless  of
           holds  rights  as  a  singular  concept.  It  is  the  implicit,   the consequences. Adhering to veracity may interfere
           species-wide agreement that one will not force another   with one’s commitment to beneficence. Clearly, ethical
           to act, or take by force the products of another’s actions.   standards taken as concrete directives do not allow for
           Rights are viewed as the critical agreement among ratio-  the consideration of context.
           nal people, the agreement of nonaggression (Husted &   The authors have redefined the ethical standards,
           Husted,  1997a).  This  agreement  emerged  as  humans   not as concrete rules, but as human qualities or char-
           became rational and developed a civilized social struc-  acter structures that can and must be recognized and
           ture. A nonaggression agreement is preconditional to all   respected in the individual (Husted & Husted, 1995b).
           human interaction. It serves as a foundation on which   For example, in Symphonological terms, beneficence
           all  other  agreements  rest.  The  formal  definition  is  as   includes the idea of acting in the patient’s best inter-
           follows: “the product of an implicit agreement among   est, but it begins with the patient’s evaluation of what
           rational beings, held by virtue of their rationality, not to   is beneficial. In this way, ethical standards are presup-
           obtain actions or the products of actions from others   positions  in  the  health  care  professional–patient
           except through voluntary consent, objectively gained”   agreement and ethical guides to decision making. The
           (Husted & Husted, 2001, p. 4). The operation of this is   participants  work  together  with  the  implicit  under-
           evident in human interaction.                 standing that each is possessed of human characteris-
             According  to  the  Husteds,  Symphonology  Theory   tics.  The  description  and  names  of  the  bioethical
           can ensure ethical action in the provision of health care.   standards have changed over time based on feedback
           Agreement is the foundation of Symphonology. Agree-  from  practitioners.  Symphonological  theory  holds
           ments can occur based on the implicit understanding of   that patients have a right to receive the benefits speci-
           human rights. The understanding of nonaggression that   fied  in  the  bioethical  standards.  Box  26–1  provides
           exists among rational persons constitutes human rights.   definitions and examples of bioethical standards.
   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549