Page 620 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 620

CHAPTER 30  Carolyn L. Wiener; Marylin J. Dodd  601

           addressing uncertainty (McCormick, 2002; Mishel,   advanced  the  concept  of  uncertainty  and  identified
           1997;  Parry,  2003).  Mishel  (1997)  has  praised  the   different types of uncertainty. The experience of living
           broad  theoretical  focus  maintained  through  the   with uncertainty was dynamic in nature with changes
           qualitative approach to theory derivation. Much of   in the types and modes of uncertainty, and various
           the work in coping with illness is constrained by the   types  of  uncertainty  were  guided  by  the  primary
           application of Lazarus and Folkman’s framework of   tenets of confidence and a sense of control.
           problem-based  or  emotion-based  coping;  however,   These  insights  demonstrate  an  evolving  body  of
           in  this  study,  inductive  reasoning  produced  data-  research  related  to  uncertainty,  control,  and  the  ill-
           based theory that identifies a broad range of strate-  ness trajectory. Rather than assume that uncertainty
           gies  related  to  tolerating  and  abating  uncertainty   is a negative aspect of life, researchers must remain
           (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Mishel, 1997). The varia-  open to positive transformational outcomes of living
           tion and range of abatement strategies identified in   through uncertainty. Wiener and Dodd’s original rec-
           this theory are a unique and significant contribution   ommendation remains salient, to expand the scope of
           to  the  body  of  research  in  coping  with  the  uncer-  the  illness  trajectory  framework  (Wiener  &  Dodd,
           tainty of illness.                            1993). The illness trajectory theoretical framework is
                                                         especially useful for understanding the variations in
                                                         uncertainty and control and for gaining a fuller per-
            Further Development                          spective  of  the  human  experience  with  cancer  and
           In an earlier response article to the original publica-  other  conditions  where  the  significance  of  uncer-
           tion, Oberst (1993) took issue with the delimitation of   tainty and control may vary.
           the concept of uncertainty to loss of control. This criti-
           cism was echoed by McCormick (2002), who theoreti-  Critique
           cally positioned loss of control in the uncertainty cycle
           rather than as a manifestation of a state of uncertainty.   Clarity
           In  their  work  on  end-of-life  caregiving,  Penrod  and   One  concern  in  the  clarity  in  Wiener  and  Dodd’s
           colleagues (2012, 2011) posit that minimizing uncer-  Theory of Illness Trajectory is the delimitation of the
           tainty by increasing confidence and control is desirable   concept of uncertainty to a loss of control. This lim-
           for  patients  and  their  family  caregivers  transitioning   ited  conceptual  perspective  of  uncertainty  is  clearly
           through  the  end-of-life  trajectory.  Further  research   set  forth  in  the  work;  therefore,  this  issue  does  not
           into the concept of control is warranted to untangle the   create a significant or fatal flaw in the work. The the-
           conceptual  boundaries  and  linkages  between  control   ory is delineated clearly and well supported by previ-
           and uncertainty throughout the illness trajectory.  ous work in illness trajectories. Propositional clarity is
             Other researchers have criticized the implicit as-  achieved in the logical presentation of relationships
           sertion that uncertainty (or loss of control) is always a   and linkages between concepts. The conceptual deri-
           negative event that requires some form of abatement   vation of managing illness as work is well developed
           (Oberst, 1993; Parry, 2003). Oberst (1993) suggested   and provides unique insight into the meaning of liv-
           the  need  for  further  investigation  to  differentiate   ing through chemotherapy during cancer treatment.
           work  related  to  tolerating  uncertainty  from  abate-  The application of the trajectory model is used consis-
           ment work in order to reveal how effective strategies   tently  to  demonstrate  the  dynamic  fluctuations  in
           in each type of work affect the sense of uncertainty   coping,  not  in  clearly  demarcated  stages  or  phases,
           throughout the trajectory. Parry (2003) studied survi-  but in situation-specific contexts of the work of man-
           vors of childhood cancer and revealed that although   aging illness.
           uncertain  states  may  be  a  problematic  stressor  for
           some, a more universal theme of embracing uncer-  Simplicity
           tainty toward transformational growth was evident in   This complex theory is interpreted in a highly accessible
           these survivors.                              manner. The Theory of Illness Trajectory adopts a so-
             Penrod (2007) helped to clarify the concept of un-  ciological framework that is applied to a phenomenon
           certainty with a phenomenological investigation that   of concern to nursing: chemotherapeutic treatment of
   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625