Page 685 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 685

666    UNIT V  Middle Range Nursing Theories

           Taiwanese, Spanish, Iranian, Portuguese, and Italian   Simplicity
           (see Kolcaba website), and translation into Turkish is   The Theory of Comfort is simple because it is basic to
           pending. Comfort of children has been accurately ob-  nursing care and the traditional mission of nursing. Its
           served and documented in perioperative settings (per-  language  and  application  are  of  low  technology,  but
           sonal communication, Nancy Laurelberry, February 16,   this does not preclude its use in highly technological
           2008),  and  the  use  of  Comfort  Daisies  by  children    settings. There are few variables in the theory, and se-
           who self-report (see website) has been tested in a hospi-  lected  variables  may  be  used  for  research  or  educa-
           tal  setting  (personal  communication,  Carrie  Majka,   tional projects. The main thrust of the theory is for
           February 28, 2008).                           nurses to return to a practice focused on the holistic
             The Theory of Comfort has been included in elec-  needs of patients inside or outside institutional walls.
           tronic nursing classification systems such as NANDA   It is simplicity that allows students and nurses to learn
           (2011), NIC (2008), and NOC (2008). Kolcaba con-  and practice the theory easily (Kolcaba, 2003).
           sults with hospitals to include comfort management
           in their documentation systems. Use of the theory has   Generality
           made  significant  contributions  to  nursing  practice   Kolcaba’s  theory  has  been  applied  in  numerous
           and the discipline. Kolcaba continues to spend time   research settings, cultures, and age groups. The only
           and energy developing and disseminating the theory   limiting factor for its application is how well nurses
           through presentations, publications, and discussions   and administrators value it to meet the comfort needs
           since retirement from full-time teaching.     of patients. If nurses, institutions, and communities
             The Theory of Comfort is widely usedas an or-  are committed to this type of nursing care, the Theory
           ganizing  framework  for  Magnet  application  and   of  Comfort  enables  efficient,  individualized,  holistic
           recertification  of  Magnet  Status.  Nurses  often   practice. The taxonomic structure of comfort facilitates
           choose  this  framework  themselves  because  it  de-  researchers’  development  of  comfort  instruments  for
           scribes what they want to do for patients and fami-  new settings.
           lies,  and  what  patients  want  from  nurses  during
           their hospitalization. An array of possible uses of   Accessibility
           the framework components is offered to the hospi-  The  first  part  of  the  theory,  asserting  that  effective
           tal, such as Comfort Rounds, performance review   nursing interventions offered over time will demon-
           criteria, methods of documentation, clinical ladder   strate  enhanced  comfort,  has  been  tested  and  sup-
           criteria, and so on. The “value added” benefit when   ported  with  numerous  studies.  Furthermore,  in  the
           nurses are supported in their comforting interven-  study by Dowd, Kolcaba, & Steiner (2000), enhanced
           tions  can  be  empirically  demonstrated  through   comfort was a strong predictor of increased health-
           measurement  of  institutional  outcomes  such  as   seeking behaviors, meaning when patients are more
           patient  satisfaction,  “Best  Hospital”  designations,   comfortable, they do better in rehab or recovery. This
           and cost savings.                             relationship supports the second and third part of the
                                                         comfort theory. The comfort instruments have dem-
            Critique                                     onstrated strong psychometric properties, supporting
                                                         the validity of the questionnaires as measures of com-
           Clarity                                       fort  that  reveal  changes  in  comfort  over  time  and
           Some of the early articles such as the concept analysis   support of the taxonomic structure.
           (Kolcaba  &  Kolcaba,  1991)  may  lack  clarity  but  are
           consistent in terms of definitions, derivations, assump-  Importance
           tions, and propositions. Clarity is much improved in   The  Theory  of  Comfort  describes  patient-centered
           the article explicating the theory and subsequent arti-  practice and explains how comfort measures matter
           cles.  Kolcaba  applies  the  theory  to  specific  practices   to patients, their health, and the viability of institu-
           using  academic,  but  understandable,  language.  All    tions.  The  theory  predicts  the  benefit  of  effective
           research concepts are defined theoretically and opera-  comfort  measures  (interventions)  for  enhancing
           tionally.                                     comfort and engagement in health-seeking behaviors.
   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690